A recent ruling by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has clarified key issues in a contract dispute between Data Mortgage, Inc. and Money Source, Inc. The court's decision, issued on September 30, 2026, affects both companies and sets important precedents for future contract interpretations. The case revolves around allegations of breach of contract and improper fees charged by Money Source to Data Mortgage.

The dispute began when Data Mortgage filed a lawsuit against Money Source in July 2021, claiming that the company had charged improper fees related to the servicing of loans. The case was filed under docket number 2024-08523 and has drawn attention due to its implications for contract law and business practices in New York.

Background

Data Mortgage, Inc. is a company that provides mortgage services, while Money Source, Inc. is a loan servicing company. The two parties entered into a written agreement on September 5, 2017, which outlined the terms under which Money Source would service Data Mortgage's loans. However, Data Mortgage alleged that Money Source breached this agreement by improperly charging various fees, including a "Transfer Fee," "Manual Set Up Fee," and "Welcome Call Fee." The lawsuit also included claims related to tax payments that Money Source allegedly failed to remit.

In response to the lawsuit, Money Source filed a counterclaim, arguing that Data Mortgage had breached a confidentiality provision in their agreement. The case was heard in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, where Judge James Hudson issued a ruling on July 1, 2024. Data Mortgage then appealed parts of the ruling, leading to the recent decision by the Appellate Division.

The Ruling

The Appellate Division reviewed the lower court's order and made several important decisions. The court granted Data Mortgage's motion for summary judgment regarding the first cause of action, which involved the improper "Transfer Fee" charged by Money Source. The court stated, "the relevant provisions of the agreement regarding the imposition of a 'Transfer Fee,' when read in context, were clear and unambiguous, and established that, under the circumstances, the defendant was prohibited from imposing a 'Transfer Fee' on the plaintiff pursuant to the terms of the agreement."

However, the court denied Data Mortgage's motions for summary judgment on the second, third, and fourth causes of action, which included the other fees and the claim for an account stated. The judges noted that the terms of the contract regarding the "Welcome Call Fee" and "Manual Set Up Fee" were ambiguous, stating, "the agreement did not define the terms 'Welcome Call Fee' or 'Manual Set Up Fee.'" This ambiguity meant that further evidence would be needed to determine the parties' intent regarding these charges.

Impact

This ruling has significant implications for both Data Mortgage and Money Source. For Data Mortgage, the court's decision to grant summary judgment on the first cause of action confirms that the company can recover damages related to the improperly charged "Transfer Fee." However, the denial of summary judgment on the other claims means that those issues will likely require further litigation or settlement discussions.

For Money Source, the ruling reinforces the need for clear and unambiguous contract terms. The court's finding that the terms regarding the additional fees were ambiguous indicates that businesses must be diligent in defining all aspects of their agreements to avoid disputes. This case could set a precedent for how courts interpret ambiguous terms in contracts, emphasizing the importance of clarity in business agreements.

What's Next

Following this ruling, both parties may consider their options for further legal action. While the decision can be appealed, it is unclear if either party will pursue that route. Additionally, the ongoing litigation related to the remaining claims may lead to a trial or settlement discussions in the near future. The outcome of this case could influence how similar disputes are handled in the future.