A Delaware court has ruled that MSG Networks Inc. (MSGN) must pay prejudgment interest to its insurers, XL Specialty Insurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. This decision comes after the insurers advanced $10 million each to MSGN as part of a settlement agreement in a separate lawsuit. The ruling could have significant implications for how similar insurance agreements are interpreted in the future.

The case, MSG Networks Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company, was filed under docket number N23C-01-103 PRW CCLD. The court's decision was issued on July 21, 2026, after a series of legal proceedings that began in 2023. The ruling clarifies the conditions under which insurers can claim prejudgment interest on advances made for settlements.

Background

MSG Networks Inc. is a sports and entertainment company that operates regional sports networks. The company became involved in a legal dispute after settling a derivative lawsuit following its merger with Sphere Entertainment. As part of this settlement, MSGN entered into agreements with XL and National, where each insurer agreed to advance $10 million toward the settlement costs. However, these agreements included a provision that allowed the insurers to seek reimbursement if it was determined that the insurance policy did not cover the settlement.

In 2023, after the insurers made their respective payments, they filed counterclaims against MSGN, seeking to recover the advances along with prejudgment interest. The case progressed through the courts, and ultimately, the insurers sought a summary judgment to confirm their right to recoup the funds along with interest from the date of payment.

The Ruling

The court ruled in favor of XL and National, stating that they were entitled to prejudgment interest accruing from the dates they made their payments to MSGN. The court highlighted that under Delaware law, prejudgment interest is awarded as a matter of right, not at the discretion of the court. The judge referenced a previous case, Citadel Holding Corp. v. Roven, to support the decision, noting that interest should begin accruing from the date payment was due.

The court stated, "XL and National are entitled to prejudgment interest accruing from their respective payment dates." This ruling confirms that the insurers have the right to seek interest from the moment they advanced the funds, reinforcing the contractual obligations outlined in the recoupment agreements.

The judge also clarified that MSGN did not waive its argument against the insurers’ claim for prejudgment interest, as the court found no indication of unfairness or lack of notice in the proceedings. The ruling emphasized that the insurers were entitled to interest from the payment dates, as MSGN had agreed to repay the amounts advanced if it was determined that the policy did not cover the settlement.

Impact

This ruling sets a precedent for how courts may interpret similar insurance agreements in the future. By affirming that prejudgment interest is a right under Delaware law, the decision highlights the importance of clear contractual language regarding interest and repayment obligations. This ruling may affect not only MSG Networks but also other companies involved in similar insurance arrangements, as it clarifies the expectations surrounding advances and repayments in settlement situations.

Moreover, the decision reinforces the principle that insurers can expect to receive interest on advances from the moment those payments are made, which could influence negotiations and agreements in future insurance contracts. The ruling may encourage insurers to be more proactive in seeking interest provisions in their contracts to protect their financial interests.

What's Next

As of now, it is unclear whether MSGN will appeal the ruling. The case may have implications for other pending cases involving similar issues of insurance coverage and prejudgment interest. Legal experts will be monitoring the situation closely to see if this ruling leads to further litigation or changes in how insurance agreements are structured.