In a recent ruling, the District Court of Appeal of Florida dismissed an appeal from McLari Logistics, Inc. This decision affects the company and its director, Mittchell McLari, as they sought to challenge a previous court ruling involving Somer Alicia Berding. The case highlights the complexities surrounding corporate dissolution and legal rights.
The case, officially known as McLari Logistics, Inc., McLari v. Berding, was filed under docket number 2D2026-0154 on August 14, 2026. The court's decision to dismiss the appeal means that the previous ruling in the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County will stand. This outcome is significant for the parties involved and could set a precedent for similar cases in the future.
The parties in this case include McLari Logistics, Inc., a Florida corporation that has been dissolved, and Somer Alicia Berding. McLari Logistics was represented by attorneys from Sastre Saavedra & Epstein, while Berding had legal representation from Keith T. Hill, P.A. The dispute arose when McLari Logistics challenged a decision made by the lower court, leading them to file for a writ of certiorari, a type of appeal that seeks to review the lower court's ruling.
The nature of the dispute centers around the rights and obligations of a dissolved corporation. McLari Logistics, through its director and trustee Mittchell McLari, aimed to contest a ruling that likely impacted their legal standing or financial responsibilities. However, the details of the lower court's decision were not available in the court filing, leaving some aspects of the case unclear.
In its ruling, the court stated simply, "Dismissed." This brief decision indicates that the court found no sufficient grounds to continue with the appeal. The judges involved in this ruling were Sleet, Rothstein-Youakim, and Smith, who all concurred with the dismissal.
The dismissal of the appeal means that the lower court's ruling remains intact. This outcome is important because it reinforces the finality of lower court decisions in cases involving dissolved corporations. It also emphasizes the challenges that dissolved entities face when attempting to reclaim or contest legal standings after dissolution.
Moving forward, this ruling may have implications for other businesses in Florida that find themselves in similar situations. Companies that have been dissolved may face difficulties in pursuing legal actions or defending themselves in court. This case serves as a reminder of the legal complexities surrounding corporate dissolution and the importance of understanding one's rights in such circumstances.
As for what comes next, it is unclear if McLari Logistics plans to appeal this decision further. The court's dismissal leaves open the possibility for future legal actions, but details were not available in the court filing regarding any related cases or potential appeals. The outcome of this case could influence how other similar cases are handled in Florida's legal system.











