The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed the sentencing of Akeem Manoo, who received an 84-month prison term for drug-related offenses. This ruling impacts Manoo and sets a precedent for how similar cases may be handled in the future.

Manoo was sentenced to 68 months for possession with intent to distribute cocaine and an additional 16 months for violating his supervised release. The court's decision, issued on November 6, 2026, confirmed that the sentences were both procedurally and substantively reasonable.

Background

Akeem Manoo, also known as Keeme, previously pleaded guilty in 2015 to conspiracy to possess over 280 grams of crack cocaine, which resulted in a 120-month prison sentence. After serving his time, he was released but was arrested again in May 2023 for possessing approximately 499.6 grams of cocaine. Following his arrest, he pleaded guilty to a new charge of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and admitted to violating the terms of his supervised release.

The case reached the Second Circuit after Manoo appealed the sentences imposed by the district court in Connecticut. He argued that the court had erred both procedurally and substantively in determining his sentences, which he claimed were excessive.

The Ruling

The Second Circuit reviewed the sentencing decisions made by the district court. The court ruled that both the Narcotics Sentence of 68 months and the Violation Sentence of 16 months were reasonable. The judges noted that the district court had adequately justified its decisions during the sentencing hearing.

The court stated, "the sentences are procedurally reasonable because the district court adequately justified its decisions to impose a consecutive sentence and to deny Manoo’s request for a downward variance as to the Narcotics Sentence."

The judges acknowledged that the district court had considered the seriousness of Manoo's conduct and his criminal history before imposing the sentences. They concluded that the sentences were not shockingly high or unsupportable as a matter of law, affirming the lower court's judgment.

Impact

This ruling has significant implications for future drug-related cases. By affirming the sentences, the Second Circuit reinforced the importance of adhering to sentencing guidelines and the discretion of district courts in determining appropriate sentences based on individual circumstances. This case may serve as a reference point for similar appeals, particularly in how courts balance mitigating and aggravating factors during sentencing.

Manoo's case highlights the consequences of violating supervised release and the seriousness with which courts treat drug offenses. The ruling emphasizes that even after serving time, individuals who re-offend can face substantial penalties.

What's Next

It is unclear whether Manoo will seek further appeal options. There are no related cases pending that have been mentioned in the court filing. However, the ruling may influence other defendants in similar situations who are considering their options following sentencing.