The Indiana Court of Appeals has reversed a jury verdict in the negligence case of Jennifer Pennington and her husband Josh against Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc., doing business as Beacon Health and Fitness. The court ruled on June 5, 2026, that the trial court made a significant error by allowing Beacon to amend its defense to include nonparty fault, which had already been determined during earlier proceedings. This ruling has implications for how negligence cases are handled, particularly regarding the introduction of nonparty defenses in court.
The case began when Jennifer Pennington sustained injuries after swimming in a pool owned by Beacon Health. During her swim, she struck her head on a concrete partition, leading to severe injuries. Jennifer and her husband subsequently filed a lawsuit against Beacon, claiming negligence. In response, Beacon asserted that other parties, specifically Spear Corporation and Panzica Building Corporation, were also at fault for the incident, which led to a complicated legal battle.
Initially, the Penningtons sued Beacon in April 2018, alleging negligence and loss of consortium. Beacon responded by naming Spear and Panzica as nonparty defendants, claiming they were responsible for the pool's design and construction. The Penningtons later amended their complaint to include these companies as defendants. Throughout the legal proceedings, both sides filed motions for summary judgment. Ultimately, the trial court granted summary judgment to Spear and Panzica, which meant that their fault was effectively dismissed from consideration in the case.
After the case was appealed, the Indiana Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision regarding Spear and Panzica, stating that the evidence did not support a finding of negligence against them. However, the Supreme Court found that there were still unresolved issues regarding Beacon's alleged negligence in the design and operation of the pool, leading to a remand for a jury trial.
During the trial, Beacon sought to amend its answer to include a nonparty defense, arguing that Spear and Panzica were at fault. The trial court allowed this amendment despite objections from the Penningtons. The jury ultimately ruled in favor of Beacon, concluding that it was not at fault for Jennifer's injuries.
The Penningtons appealed the decision, arguing that the trial court erred in permitting Beacon to introduce the nonparty defense, as the fault of Spear and Panzica had already been adjudicated. The court agreed, stating, "the jury should not have been allowed to consider whether to apportion fault to Spear and Panzica." The ruling emphasized that allowing the jury to hear evidence regarding the fault of parties whose negligence had already been dismissed undermined the integrity of the trial.
The court concluded that the error was not harmless and that it affected the outcome of the trial. The judges noted that Beacon's defense strategy heavily relied on implicating Spear and Panzica as potentially culpable, which could have influenced the jury's perception of the case. The court stated, "the error in allowing the nonparty defense fundamentally undermines confidence in the jury’s verdict." As a result, the court reversed the trial court's judgment and ordered a new trial for the Penningtons.
This ruling is significant as it clarifies the limitations on introducing nonparty defenses in negligence cases. The court's decision reinforces that once a party's lack of fault has been determined, it cannot be revisited in subsequent proceedings. This case may set a precedent for similar negligence claims in Indiana, ensuring that defendants cannot revisit issues that have already been settled in court.
Looking ahead, the Penningtons will have the opportunity to present their case again in a new trial, where the jury will not be allowed to consider the fault of Spear and Panzica. This outcome could potentially lead to a different verdict, depending on how the evidence is presented and interpreted in the new proceedings. The case number for this appeal is 25A-CT-01683.











