A New York Supreme Court judge ruled against John J. Alterio in his attempt to prevent eviction from a property he claimed to own. The court's decision, issued on April 16, 2026, affects Alterio's rights to the residential property located at 192 Titusville Road, Poughkeepsie, New York. The ruling highlights the complexities surrounding property ownership and foreclosure actions, particularly when legal claims are disputed.
The case, known as Alterio v. Bank of America, N.A., was filed under docket number Index No. 2025-55404. The court's ruling is significant as it underscores the importance of proper legal procedures and documentation in property disputes. Alterio sought a preliminary injunction to stop eviction proceedings initiated by Bank of America, which had acquired the property through a foreclosure auction.
Background
The dispute began when Bank of America filed a foreclosure action against the property in April 2023, claiming that the previous owner, Susan T. Monopoli, had defaulted on her mortgage payments. Monopoli passed away in March 2022, and the bank named several heirs in the foreclosure action. However, Alterio was not included among them.
After the foreclosure judgment was issued in October 2024, the property was sold at auction to Bank of America in February 2025. Alterio, who claimed to be the legal owner based on a quitclaim deed executed by Monopoli in February 2021, filed a previous lawsuit seeking to quiet title to the property. This earlier case was dismissed due to procedural issues, including failure to serve the defendants properly.
In September 2025, Alterio filed a new lawsuit, asserting similar claims of ownership. He sought a temporary restraining order to prevent eviction, arguing that he had maintained possession of the property since December 2020. The court's decision on April 16 addressed both his request for an injunction and the defendants' motion to dismiss the case.
The Ruling
Judge Maria G. Rosa ruled against Alterio, denying his request for a preliminary injunction and granting the defendants' motion to dismiss the case. The court found that Alterio failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits of his claims. The judge stated, "Having failed to demonstrate that he is likely to succeed on the merits of any applicable cause of action, Plaintiff is not entitled to injunctive relief."
The court also noted that Alterio's claims were undermined by the lack of valid documentation proving his ownership. The purported quitclaim deed he presented was found to be improperly executed and not recorded in the Dutchess County Clerk's office. The judge emphasized that without proper evidence of ownership, Alterio could not claim a right to remain in the property.
Furthermore, the court ruled that Alterio's attempts to challenge the foreclosure judgment were inappropriate, as they constituted a collateral attack on the prior ruling. The judge concluded that the case should be dismissed based on lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a valid claim.
Impact
This ruling has significant implications for Alterio and potentially for other homeowners facing similar situations. The court's decision reinforces the necessity for individuals to have clear and legally recognized ownership of property before challenging foreclosure actions. It highlights the importance of adhering to legal procedures, such as proper service of process and maintaining accurate records.
For homeowners, this case serves as a cautionary tale about the risks of relying on questionable documentation and the complexities of property law. The ruling may also deter others from pursuing similar claims without solid legal foundations, emphasizing that courts require clear evidence of ownership and legitimate legal standing.
What's Next
Alterio's options for appeal remain unclear. The court's decision may be appealed, but the likelihood of success could be limited given the strong basis for the ruling. There are no related cases pending at this time, but the outcome of this case could influence future disputes involving property ownership and foreclosure actions in New York.










