A Texas appellate court has upheld the dismissal of a personal injury lawsuit filed by Brenda Boulware against the City of Austin. Boulware claimed she was injured during a power outage at Austin Bergstrom International Airport. The court ruled that she did not provide sufficient notice of her claim as required by law, which is a key factor in pursuing a lawsuit against a governmental entity.
The case, Brenda Boulware v. City of Austin, Acting by and Through Its Agent d/b/a Austin Energy and d/b/a Austin Bergstrom Airport, was filed in the Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, with the docket number 03-25-00632-CV. This ruling is significant as it reinforces the legal standards surrounding claims against government entities in Texas.
Background
Brenda Boulware's legal troubles began on September 7, 2022, when she arrived at Austin Bergstrom Airport for a flight to Las Vegas. While waiting for her boarding announcement, the lights in the terminal went out unexpectedly, leaving her in complete darkness. In her attempt to navigate the terminal, she collided with a table and chairs, resulting in serious injuries to her left leg, shoulder, and arm.
Initially, Boulware was represented by attorney Scott Ogle, who passed away in 2023. After receiving her case file, she hired new counsel and filed a lawsuit against the City of Austin in September 2024, alleging negligence, premises liability, and gross negligence. Boulware claimed that the City failed to provide adequate lighting and warnings about the potential dangers of the outage.
The City of Austin responded with a plea to the jurisdiction, arguing that Boulware did not meet the legal requirements for suing a governmental entity under the Texas Tort Claims Act (TTCA). The City contended that she failed to provide timely notice of her claim, which is necessary to waive the government’s immunity from lawsuits.
The Ruling
The Texas Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the City of Austin, affirming the trial court's decision to dismiss Boulware's claims. The court highlighted that Boulware did not demonstrate that the City had received the required notice of her injury within the six-month timeframe stipulated by the TTCA. The court stated, "Because Boulware did not affirmatively demonstrate the trial court’s jurisdiction over her claims against the City by showing that a statutory waiver of immunity applies, we affirm the order of the trial court."
Justice Rosa Lopez Theofanis, along with Justices Triana and Crump, presided over the case. The court found that Boulware's affidavit did not provide sufficient evidence to establish that the City had actual notice of her claim or its alleged fault in causing her injuries.
Impact
This ruling has significant implications for individuals seeking to file personal injury claims against government entities in Texas. It underscores the importance of adhering to the notice requirements outlined in the TTCA. Without proper notice, plaintiffs may find their claims dismissed, regardless of the merits of their case.
The ruling may also serve as a cautionary tale for other individuals who may consider suing a governmental entity. It emphasizes the need for timely and clear communication regarding any claims of injury, particularly in situations involving public facilities. This decision reinforces the legal protections afforded to governmental entities and the procedural hurdles that plaintiffs must navigate in such cases.
What's Next
Boulware's options for appealing the decision may be limited, as the court has affirmed the trial court's ruling. There is no indication in the court filing about any related cases pending that may affect this ruling. Details were not available in the court filing.










