A Texas court has dismissed an appeal regarding the divorce of Angela Maria Pennington Briggs and Hiley Benton Jes Briggs after the appellant failed to respond to a court request. This decision affects the parties involved in the divorce and highlights the importance of timely communication in legal proceedings.

The case, titled In the Matter of the Marriage of Angela Maria Pennington Briggs and Hiley Benton Jes Briggs and in the Interest of H.J.J.B., a Child, was filed under docket number 10-26-00240-CV in the Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco). The court issued its ruling on September 30, 2026, following a notice of appeal filed by Angela Pennington Briggs.

The dispute arose from a final decree of divorce issued by the 74th District Court of McLennan County, Texas, presided over by Judge Peter Rusek. Angela Pennington Briggs filed a pro se notice of appeal, meaning she represented herself without an attorney. On September 10, 2026, the trial court granted a motion for a new trial, which led to the appeal.

After the appeal was filed, the Texas Court of Appeals requested a response from Angela Pennington Briggs regarding her intentions to proceed with the appeal. The court set a deadline for her response, which was due by September 21, 2026. The court warned that the appeal would be dismissed without further notice if she did not respond.

As of the deadline, Angela Pennington Briggs did not respond to the court's request. Consequently, the Texas Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal based on her lack of communication. Justice Steve Smith delivered the opinion of the court, stating, "Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c)." The ruling was made with the concurrence of Chief Justice Johnson and Justice Harris.

This dismissal underscores the critical nature of adhering to court procedures and deadlines. It serves as a reminder that parties in legal disputes must remain engaged and responsive to the court's requests to avoid losing their rights to appeal or contest decisions.

The outcome of this case has implications for both Angela Pennington Briggs and Hiley Benton Jes Briggs, as the dismissal of the appeal means that the final decree of divorce stands. It also emphasizes the importance of legal representation, particularly in complex matters like divorce, where navigating the legal system can be challenging for individuals representing themselves.

This ruling does not set a new legal precedent but reinforces existing rules regarding the dismissal of appeals for lack of response. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure allow for such dismissals under specific circumstances, ensuring that the court's time and resources are not wasted on inactive cases.

Looking ahead, it is unclear whether Angela Pennington Briggs will seek to appeal this decision further or if she will pursue other legal options. The court filing did not provide details regarding any related cases or potential future actions. However, the dismissal of this appeal effectively concludes this particular legal challenge unless new developments arise.