The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has accepted the resignation of attorney Gregory R. Watchman. This decision, made on October 8, 2026, allows Watchman to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons. The ruling affects Watchman, who has practiced law since 1986, and it is significant as it underscores the process for attorneys wishing to leave the profession without facing disciplinary actions.

Watchman, who is based in Arlington, Virginia, filed his application to resign on June 24, 2026. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (AGC) indicated that it did not oppose his resignation. The court's acceptance of his application means that he will no longer be able to practice law in New York.

The matter began when Watchman submitted his affidavit to the court, expressing his desire to resign from the bar. The AGC reviewed his application and confirmed that they had no objections. This led to the court's decision to grant his request. The ruling is a formal acknowledgment of Watchman's choice to leave the legal profession in New York.

The court ruled, "Gregory R. Watchman's application for permission to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted." The decision was made by a panel of judges, including Clark, J.P., Ceresia, McShan, Powers, and Ryba.

In addition to accepting Watchman's resignation, the court ordered that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys in New York. This action is effective immediately. The court also mandated that Watchman must cease all legal practice in the state, whether as a principal or in any other capacity. Furthermore, he is prohibited from presenting himself as an attorney in New York.

The ruling emphasizes the importance of following proper procedures when an attorney chooses to resign. It highlights that attorneys can resign for nondisciplinary reasons, which can simplify the process compared to resignations that involve disciplinary actions. This decision may serve as a reference for other attorneys considering similar actions in the future.

Watchman's resignation means he will no longer be able to provide legal services or represent clients in New York. This ruling impacts not only Watchman but also any clients who may have relied on his legal expertise. It is a reminder of the ongoing changes in the legal profession and the various reasons attorneys may choose to step away from practice.

Looking ahead, Watchman has 30 days from the date of the ruling to surrender any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him. This requirement ensures that he no longer has access to the privileges associated with being a practicing attorney in New York.

Details were not available in the court filing regarding any potential future plans Watchman may have after his resignation. There is also no indication of any related cases pending in connection with this matter.