In a recent ruling, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York accepted the resignation of attorney Robin Plummer Keller. This decision, made on April 30, 2026, allows Keller to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons. The ruling affects Keller, who has been a practicing attorney since 2002, and it marks a significant moment in his legal career.

The case, officially titled Matter of Keller, was filed under docket number PM-81-26. The court's decision comes after Keller submitted an affidavit requesting to resign, which was not opposed by the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Background

Robin Plummer Keller was admitted to practice law in New York in 2002 and has maintained a business address in Norwalk, Connecticut. The circumstances surrounding his resignation are not related to any disciplinary actions or misconduct. Instead, Keller sought to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, which is permitted under the state's rules for attorney disciplinary matters.

The Attorney Grievance Committee (AGC) for the Third Judicial Department reviewed Keller's request. They indicated that they did not oppose his application, suggesting that there were no concerns regarding his professional conduct that would warrant a denial of his resignation. This lack of opposition played a crucial role in the court's decision to grant Keller's request.

The Ruling

The court ruled unanimously to accept Keller's resignation. The opinion, delivered per curiam, stated, "Keller is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant his application and accept his resignation." The ruling was made by a panel of judges, including Pritzker, J.P., Ceresia, Fisher, McShan, and Corcoran.

As part of the ruling, the court ordered that Keller's name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in New York, effective immediately. The court also commanded Keller to refrain from practicing law in any capacity within the state, which includes acting as an agent, clerk, or employee for another attorney.

Impact

This resignation has implications for Keller's future in the legal field. By resigning, he is no longer permitted to provide legal services or advice in New York. The ruling also reinforces the process for attorneys wishing to resign without facing disciplinary actions. It highlights the importance of maintaining professional standards and the role of the Attorney Grievance Committee in overseeing attorney conduct.

While Keller's resignation does not appear to set any new legal precedent, it serves as a reminder of the procedures available for attorneys who may wish to leave the profession without facing disciplinary measures. The AGC's lack of opposition indicates that Keller's decision was amicable and without conflict, which can be a critical factor for other attorneys considering a similar path.

What's Next

Details were not available in the court filing regarding whether Keller plans to pursue legal work in another jurisdiction or field. However, the ruling is final, and Keller's resignation cannot be appealed. He must also surrender any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him within 30 days of the court's decision.