The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has reinstated attorney Tova L. Kanarfogel to the practice of law after she successfully met the requirements following her suspension. This decision, issued on June 18, 2026, affects Kanarfogel's ability to practice law and highlights the court's process for attorney reinstatement.
Kanarfogel, who was suspended in May 2019 due to violations of Judiciary Law § 468-a, filed a motion for reinstatement. The court's ruling emphasizes the importance of compliance with legal standards for attorneys and the careful evaluation process involved in reinstating a suspended attorney.
Background
Tova L. Kanarfogel was previously suspended from practicing law by the Appellate Division in May 2019. The suspension stemmed from violations of Judiciary Law § 468-a, which governs attorney registration and compliance. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department acted as the petitioner in this case, representing the interests of the legal profession and the public.
After her suspension, Kanarfogel took steps to comply with the court's order and the relevant rules for attorney disciplinary matters. She filed a motion for reinstatement on April 15, 2026, which included an affidavit and supporting documents demonstrating her compliance with the court's requirements. The Attorney Grievance Committee reviewed her motion and provided a response to the court.
The Ruling
The court ruled in favor of Kanarfogel's reinstatement, stating that she had met the necessary criteria for returning to practice. The judges involved in this decision included Pritzker, J.P., Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia, Mackey, and Ryba, who all concurred with the ruling.
The court noted, "respondent has satisfied the requirements of Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16 (c) (5)," and determined that "it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law."
This decision signifies that Kanarfogel has demonstrated the requisite character and fitness to practice law, which are essential components of the reinstatement process. The court emphasized that she had complied with the order of suspension and the rules of the court.
Impact
The reinstatement of Tova L. Kanarfogel is significant for both her and the legal community. For Kanarfogel, this decision allows her to resume her legal career and serve her clients once again. For the legal profession, it reinforces the importance of accountability and the structured process for addressing attorney misconduct.
This ruling may also serve as a reference for other attorneys who face suspension and seek reinstatement. It illustrates the court's commitment to ensuring that attorneys who wish to return to practice can do so if they meet the established requirements. The decision underscores the balance between maintaining professional standards and allowing for the rehabilitation of attorneys.
What's Next
There is no indication that Kanarfogel's reinstatement will be appealed. The court's decision appears to be final, allowing her to practice law immediately. Details about any related cases or future disciplinary actions were not available in the court filing.