A Florida court has dismissed part of an appeal concerning attorney fees in a case involving the Krej Irrevocable Trust Number 7 and Cliché Piano Bar & Pool Lounge, LLC. The decision affects the parties involved in the case and clarifies the rules regarding appeals for attorney fees in Florida.
The case, Harold R. E. Johnson, Trustee of Krej Irrevocable Trust Number 7 v. Cliché Piano Bar & Pool Lounge, LLC, was filed under docket number 2D19-0616. The appeal arose from a ruling made by the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, presided over by Judge Keith Meyer. The ruling involved several parties, including the State of Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation and the State of Florida Department of Revenue.
The dispute centers on the appeal from the Krej Irrevocable Trust, represented by Harold R.E. Johnson, who challenged a lower court's decision that granted attorney fees to Cliché Piano Bar. The appeal was filed after the Circuit Court issued an order related to these fees, prompting Johnson to seek a review of the decision.
The District Court of Appeal of Florida addressed the appeal on February 7, 2020. The court ruled that part of the appeal regarding the attorney fees was nonfinal and nonappealable. The court stated, "We dismiss the portion of this appeal wherein appellant challenges the portion of the order granting appellee's motion for attorneys' fees... as that portion of the order is nonfinal and nonappealable." This ruling follows established precedents in Florida law, which specify that an order determining entitlement to attorney fees without setting the amount is not subject to appeal.
The court affirmed the remainder of the orders on appeal without further comment, indicating that while some aspects of the appeal were dismissed, other parts were upheld. Judges Northcutt, LaRose, and Morris concurred in the decision.
This ruling has significant implications for future cases involving attorney fees in Florida. It clarifies that parties cannot appeal orders that only determine entitlement to fees without specifying the amount. This decision reinforces the legal principle that appeals can only be made on final orders, which may influence how parties approach litigation involving attorney fees.
Going forward, this decision may affect individuals and entities involved in disputes over attorney fees, as they will need to be aware of the limitations on appealing such orders. The ruling emphasizes the importance of understanding the legal standards surrounding appeals in Florida, particularly in cases where attorney fees are at stake.
Details were not available in the court filing regarding whether the decision can be appealed further or if there are related cases pending. However, the court's ruling provides clarity on the specific issue of appealing attorney fee orders, which may impact future litigation strategies for parties involved in similar disputes.











