The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals has dismissed an appeal involving Robert Larsson and 808 Consultant LLC against Hawai'i Mold and Flood, LLC. This decision, made on October 27, 2026, affects the parties involved in the case and clarifies the outcome of their legal dispute. The dismissal means that the appeal will not proceed, and both sides will bear their own legal costs.

The case, identified by docket number CAAP-26-0000053, involved a stipulation filed by Hawai'i Mold and Flood, LLC. The stipulation requested the court to dismiss the appeal, which had not yet been officially docketed. This stipulation was signed by the attorneys representing all parties involved, indicating a mutual agreement to end the appeal process.

In this case, Robert Larsson and 808 Consultant LLC were the plaintiffs, while Hawai'i Mold and Flood, LLC and Glen Kelsey were the defendants. The specifics of the original dispute were not detailed in the court's opinion, but the dismissal of the appeal indicates that both parties have reached a resolution or decided to discontinue the litigation.

The court's ruling stated, "the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal with prejudice and bear their own attorneys' fees and costs." This means that the appeal cannot be brought back to court in the future, and each party will be responsible for its own legal expenses incurred during the appeal process.

The judges involved in this decision included Presiding Judge Clyde J. Wadsworth and Associate Judges Sonja M.P. McCullen and Daniel M. Gluck. Their approval of the stipulation indicates that the court found no reason to contest the agreement made by the parties.

This dismissal has implications for the parties involved, as it effectively concludes the appellate process for this case. It also serves as a reminder of the importance of reaching agreements in legal disputes, as both sides can avoid further costs and uncertainties associated with ongoing litigation.

Going forward, this dismissal means that the original case's outcome remains intact, and the parties will not have the opportunity to appeal the decision made in the lower court. The resolution allows both parties to move on without the burden of further legal proceedings.

Details were not available in the court filing regarding whether there are any related cases pending or if either party plans to pursue further legal action in the future. However, the dismissal of this appeal suggests that the parties have opted to settle their differences outside of the appellate court.