The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has ruled in favor of the Town of Kittery in a case involving a disputed conservation subdivision application. The court's decision, issued on July 9, 2026, affirms the Planning Board's authority to waive certain street standards in the town's Land Use and Development Code. This ruling affects local land use regulations and clarifies the powers of the Planning Board versus the Board of Appeals.

The case, Judith Andrews v. Town of Kittery, centers around Judith Andrews, who challenged the Planning Board's approval of a subdivision application submitted by Chip and Anne Andrews, her relatives. Judith Andrews argued that the Planning Board overstepped its authority by waiving street standards that should only be granted by the Town's Board of Appeals. The court's ruling is significant as it clarifies the scope of authority of local planning boards in Maine.

Background

The dispute began when Chip and Anne Andrews applied to the Town Planner of Kittery for a sketch plan review of their proposed subdivision in February 2022. The Planning Board approved the sketch plan concept in March 2023. Following this, the Andrews submitted a preliminary application for a major conservation subdivision in September 2023.

According to the town's Land Use and Development Code, a conservation subdivision must meet all subdivision requirements unless modified by the Planning Board. The Planning Board has the authority to waive certain improvements if it determines that public health, safety, and welfare are not compromised. Judith Andrews, owning land near the proposed subdivision, opposed the application, claiming the Planning Board lacked the authority to grant the waivers requested by the applicants.

The Ruling

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the Planning Board acted within its authority when it approved the conservation subdivision application. The court stated, "The Planning Board did not intrude on the exclusive authority of the Board of Appeals to grant a variance and therefore affirm the Superior Court’s judgment affirming the Planning Board’s decision." This decision upheld the previous ruling by the York County Superior Court, which had also affirmed the Planning Board's actions.

The court clarified that the street standards in question were not zoning requirements that would necessitate a variance from the Board of Appeals. Instead, they were part of the general performance standards applicable town-wide, which the Planning Board could waive under specific circumstances. The ruling emphasized that the Planning Board's authority to waive certain standards is consistent with the town's regulatory framework.

Impact

This ruling has significant implications for land use regulations in Kittery and potentially other municipalities in Maine. It clarifies that Planning Boards have the authority to make decisions regarding subdivision applications without needing to refer to the Board of Appeals for variances on general performance standards. This decision could streamline the approval process for future developments, allowing for more flexibility in local land use planning.

Moreover, the ruling sets a precedent that distinguishes between zoning ordinances and general land use regulations. It reinforces the idea that Planning Boards can exercise discretion in waiving certain standards to promote public welfare, as long as they do not conflict with the core zoning requirements. This distinction is crucial for future cases involving similar disputes over land use and planning authority.

What's Next

Judith Andrews may consider appealing the ruling to a higher court, but details on any potential further legal action were not available in the court filing. Meanwhile, the Town of Kittery can proceed with the approved conservation subdivision, which may set the stage for future developments in the area.