In a significant ruling, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has suspended attorney Francis J. O'Reilly for three years due to his felony convictions for tax evasion. This decision affects O'Reilly, who has been found guilty of serious misconduct, and serves as a warning to other legal professionals about the consequences of unethical behavior.

The court's ruling, dated August 12, 2026, follows O'Reilly's conviction in December 2019 for attempting to evade taxes and for willfully failing to collect or pay payroll taxes. The court's decision underscores the importance of integrity and ethical standards in the legal profession.

Background

Francis J. O'Reilly was admitted to practice law in New York on June 21, 1989. He operated a law firm where he was responsible for managing payroll taxes for his employees. However, O'Reilly failed to pay these taxes, instead using the funds for personal and business expenses. His actions led to serious legal consequences, including criminal charges.

In December 2019, O'Reilly pleaded guilty to two felony counts in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The charges stemmed from his failure to remit payroll taxes and his fraudulent tax filings, which misrepresented his income. Following his conviction, he was sentenced to 18 months in prison, beginning in March 2021, and was also ordered to pay restitution of $801,969.

The Ruling

The Appellate Division issued its ruling after considering the findings of a Special Referee who reviewed O'Reilly's case. The court confirmed the Special Referee's report, which found that O'Reilly's felony convictions constituted professional misconduct. The judges involved in the ruling included Hector D. Lasalle, Mark C. Dillon, Colleen D. Duffy, Betsy Barros, and Valerie Brathwaite Nelson.

The court stated, "The respondent used his experience as a CPA and a tax professional to intentionally avoid his tax obligations for almost 20 years, for his own personal benefit." This statement highlights the severity of O'Reilly's actions and their implications for his professional standing.

Impact

The suspension of O'Reilly from practicing law for three years serves as a reminder of the legal profession's commitment to ethical standards. His case illustrates the consequences of failing to uphold these standards, particularly when it involves financial misconduct. This ruling may impact other attorneys who find themselves in similar situations, reinforcing the notion that unethical behavior will not be tolerated.

O'Reilly's suspension will remain in effect until at least February 12, 2029, when he may apply for reinstatement. To be considered for reinstatement, he must demonstrate compliance with various conditions, including refraining from practicing law during his suspension and fulfilling continuing legal education requirements.

What's Next

O'Reilly has the option to appeal the court's decision, although details regarding any potential appeal were not available in the court filing. The case serves as a critical example of the legal system's approach to maintaining ethical standards among attorneys.