The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has accepted the resignation of attorney Craig Prescott Wilson. This decision, made on November 5, 2026, affects Wilson's ability to practice law in New York. It is significant as it underscores the process by which attorneys can resign from the bar for nondisciplinary reasons.

Wilson, who was admitted to practice law in New York in 2010, filed his application to resign without facing any disciplinary action. His resignation reflects a voluntary decision to leave the profession in New York, which can happen for various personal or professional reasons.

The case, officially titled Matter of Wilson, was assigned docket number PM-249-26. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (AGC) reviewed Wilson's application and indicated that they did not oppose his request. This lack of opposition from the AGC suggests that Wilson's resignation was not prompted by any misconduct or legal issues.

Wilson's affidavit, which he swore to on September 4, 2026, and subsequently filed on September 9, 2026, provided the basis for his resignation. The AGC's Deputy Chief Attorney also submitted correspondence on October 26, 2026, supporting the acceptance of Wilson's resignation.

In their ruling, the court stated, "Upon reading Wilson's affidavit... and having determined that Wilson is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant his application and accept his resignation." The judges involved in this decision included Garry, P.J., Clark, Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald, and McShan.

The court's ruling means that Wilson's name will be removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in New York, effective immediately. This action prohibits him from practicing law in any capacity within the state. The court ordered Wilson to cease any legal practice, whether as a principal or as an employee of another, and to refrain from presenting himself as an attorney in New York.

Additionally, Wilson is required to return any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him within 30 days of the court's decision. This requirement ensures that he no longer has access to legal facilities or resources associated with the practice of law in New York.

The impact of this resignation is notable for both Wilson and the legal community. For Wilson, this marks the end of his legal career in New York, allowing him to pursue other opportunities or interests outside of the legal profession. For the legal community, it highlights the procedures in place for attorneys who wish to resign without facing disciplinary actions, ensuring that the integrity of the bar is maintained.

This ruling does not set a new legal precedent but reinforces existing rules regarding attorney resignations. It serves as a reminder that attorneys have the option to resign voluntarily and that such resignations can be accepted without disciplinary proceedings if the circumstances warrant it.

Looking ahead, it is unclear whether Wilson will pursue any further legal actions or if he has plans to continue practicing law in another jurisdiction. The court's decision is final, and there is no indication that Wilson intends to appeal this ruling or has any related cases pending.