In a recent decision, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York accepted the resignation of attorney Harry M. Reichenberg. This ruling, made on September 3, 2026, allows Reichenberg to leave the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons. The court's decision affects Reichenberg's ability to practice law in New York and sets a precedent for future resignations under similar circumstances.
Harry M. Reichenberg, who has been a member of the New York bar since 2005, submitted his resignation application to the court. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, which oversees attorney conduct in the region, indicated that it did not oppose Reichenberg's request. The ruling signifies a formal end to Reichenberg's legal career in New York.
The case, identified by docket number PM-197-26, began when Reichenberg filed an affidavit on July 7, 2026, expressing his desire to resign. The Attorney Grievance Committee reviewed his application and provided a response by August 26, 2026. After considering the materials presented, the court concluded that Reichenberg was eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons.
In its ruling, the court stated, "Harry M. Reichenberg's application for permission to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted." The judges involved in this decision included Garry, P.J., Aarons, Pritzker, McShan, and Mackey. This unanimous decision underscores the court's agreement on the matter.
The ruling has immediate effects. Reichenberg's name has been officially removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in New York. The court also ordered him to refrain from practicing law in any capacity within the state. This includes acting as an attorney, giving legal advice, or holding himself out as an attorney.
Furthermore, Reichenberg is required to surrender any Attorney Secure Pass he holds to the Office of Court Administration within 30 days of the decision. This step is crucial for ensuring that he no longer has access to legal privileges associated with being a practicing attorney.
This case highlights the process by which attorneys can resign from the bar in New York. Resignations for nondisciplinary reasons are permitted under the Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters, specifically section 1240.22. The court's acceptance of Reichenberg's resignation demonstrates that attorneys can leave their positions without facing disciplinary actions, provided they follow the appropriate procedures.
The impact of this ruling extends beyond Reichenberg. It sets a clear example for other attorneys considering resignation for similar reasons. The court's decision reinforces the importance of adhering to formal procedures when resigning from the bar.
Looking ahead, there are no indications that Reichenberg plans to appeal this decision. The court's ruling is final, and he has been ordered to cease all legal practice in New York. Details about any related cases were not available in the court filing.











