A New York appellate court has accepted the resignation of attorney Harry Aaron Horwitz, who voluntarily chose to leave the bar for nondisciplinary reasons. The decision, made by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York on May 14, 2026, affects Horwitz's ability to practice law in New York and requires him to cease all legal activities immediately.
The ruling is significant as it underscores the procedures attorneys must follow when resigning from the bar, even when the resignation is not due to disciplinary actions. Horwitz's case highlights the importance of maintaining proper legal protocols for attorneys, ensuring that they adhere to the standards set forth by the state’s legal system.
Background
Harry Aaron Horwitz, who was admitted to practice law in New York in 1989, submitted his resignation to the court. His business address is listed in Princeton, New Jersey. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (AGC) reviewed his application and indicated that it did not oppose Horwitz's request to resign.
Horwitz filed an affidavit on April 28, 2026, detailing his reasons for resigning. The AGC responded to his application on May 7, 2026, confirming that he met the eligibility criteria for a nondisciplinary resignation. This process allowed the court to evaluate the circumstances surrounding his resignation without any allegations of misconduct.
The Ruling
The court ruled in favor of Horwitz's application, granting him permission to resign from the New York bar. The decision was made by a panel of judges, including Pritzker, Ceresia, Powers, Mackey, and Ryba. The court stated, “Horwitz is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons,” and accepted his resignation effective immediately.
As part of the ruling, the court ordered that Horwitz's name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in New York. The judges emphasized that Horwitz must refrain from practicing law in any capacity, whether as a principal, agent, or employee. Furthermore, he is prohibited from appearing as an attorney before any legal authority or providing legal advice.
Impact
This ruling has immediate implications for Horwitz, as he must surrender any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him within 30 days. It also serves as a reminder to other attorneys about the importance of following proper procedures when resigning from the bar. The court's acceptance of a nondisciplinary resignation indicates that attorneys have the option to leave the profession without facing any allegations of misconduct.
The decision may also influence other attorneys considering resignation, as it clarifies the process and reinforces the standards required for a smooth transition. While this case does not set a new legal precedent, it reinforces the existing rules governing attorney resignations in New York.
What's Next
Horwitz's resignation is effective immediately, and it does not appear that he intends to appeal the decision. There are no related cases pending at this time, and details about any future legal activities by Horwitz remain unclear.