In a recent ruling, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York accepted the resignation of attorney Lawrence B. Litwin. This decision, made on May 7, 2026, allows Litwin to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons. The ruling affects Litwin's ability to practice law in New York and ensures he can no longer serve as an attorney in the state.
This case is significant as it illustrates the process through which attorneys can resign from the bar, even when not facing disciplinary action. The court's decision emphasizes the importance of maintaining the integrity of the legal profession, while also providing a pathway for attorneys who wish to step away from their practice.
Background
Lawrence B. Litwin was admitted to practice law in New York in 1981 and has since maintained a business address in Morristown, New Jersey. His application for resignation was submitted under the rules governing attorney disciplinary matters, which allow for resignations for nondisciplinary reasons. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (AGC) reviewed Litwin's application and indicated that it did not oppose his request.
The case reached the Appellate Division after Litwin filed an affidavit on April 21, 2026, expressing his desire to resign. The AGC provided a response to the court on April 28, 2026, confirming its non-opposition to Litwin's resignation. This collaborative approach between Litwin and the AGC facilitated a smooth process for the court's decision.
The Ruling
The court ruled in favor of Litwin's application, stating, "Upon reading Litwin's affidavit... and having determined that Litwin is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant his application and accept his resignation." The judges involved in this decision included Pritzker, J.P., Ceresia, Fisher, McShan, and Corcoran.
As a result of this ruling, Litwin's name has been stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in New York, effective immediately. The court also ordered that Litwin must cease all legal practice in New York and refrain from holding himself out as an attorney. This includes any form of legal advice or representation before any court or authority.
Impact
This ruling has immediate implications for Litwin, who can no longer practice law in New York. It also serves as a reminder to other attorneys about the procedures for resigning from the bar. The court's acceptance of a nondisciplinary resignation indicates that attorneys have options for stepping away from their careers without facing disciplinary actions.
The decision also reinforces the standards and regulations governing attorney conduct in New York. By accepting Litwin's resignation, the court helps maintain the integrity of the legal profession, ensuring that only those who are qualified and compliant with the rules remain on the rolls of practicing attorneys.
What's Next
Litwin's resignation is final, and there is no indication that he plans to appeal this decision. The court has ordered him to surrender any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him within 30 days. There are no related cases pending that would affect this ruling.