The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has accepted the resignation of attorney Michael William Solinsky. This decision, made on August 13, 2026, allows Solinsky to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons. The ruling affects Solinsky, who can no longer practice law in New York.
The court's ruling is significant as it highlights the process through which attorneys can resign without facing disciplinary actions. Solinsky's case sets a precedent for other attorneys seeking similar resignations.
Background
Michael William Solinsky was admitted to practice law in New York in 1986. He has listed a business address in Herndon, Virginia, with the Office of Court Administration. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (AGC) reviewed Solinsky's application for resignation and indicated that it did not oppose his request.
Solinsky filed an affidavit on June 3, 2026, which was subsequently submitted to the court on June 8, 2026. The AGC responded to this application on June 29, 2026, confirming that Solinsky was eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons. This led to the court's consideration of his resignation request.
The Ruling
The court ruled unanimously to grant Solinsky's application for resignation. The decision was made by Justices Clark, Ceresia, McShan, Powers, and Ryba. The court stated, "Upon reading Solinsky's affidavit... and having determined that Solinsky is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant his application and accept his resignation."
As a result of this ruling, Solinsky's name has been stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in New York, effective immediately. The court also ordered that he must refrain from practicing law in any capacity within the state.
Impact
This ruling has immediate implications for Solinsky, who is now barred from practicing law in New York. He is forbidden from appearing as an attorney before any court or public authority in the state. The decision also emphasizes the importance of the resignation process for attorneys who may wish to exit the profession without facing disciplinary actions.
Solinsky's resignation could influence other attorneys considering similar actions, as it demonstrates that a resignation can be accepted without disciplinary proceedings. This case may set a precedent for future resignations under similar circumstances.
What's Next
Solinsky's resignation is final, and there is no indication that he plans to appeal the court's decision. He is required to surrender any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him within 30 days of the ruling. Details were not available in the court filing regarding any related cases.