The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has accepted attorney Vincent Capasso Jr.'s resignation from the bar. This decision, made on September 3, 2026, affects Capasso, who has been a practicing attorney since 1978. The ruling is significant as it allows Capasso to step down without facing any disciplinary action.
Capasso, who has a business address in Schenectady, sought to resign for nondisciplinary reasons. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department reviewed his request and indicated that it did not oppose his application. This decision is important as it highlights the process through which attorneys can resign from practice without facing disciplinary measures.
Background
Vincent Capasso Jr. has been a licensed attorney in New York since 1978. His legal career spans several decades, during which he has built a reputation in the legal community. Recently, Capasso decided to resign from his position as an attorney, citing nondisciplinary reasons for his departure.
The case came before the Appellate Division after Capasso submitted an affidavit on July 9, 2026, expressing his desire to resign. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department reviewed his application and did not oppose it, paving the way for the court's decision.
The Ruling
The court ruled in favor of Capasso's resignation, stating, “We grant his application and accept his resignation.” The decision was made by a panel of judges, including Garry, P.J., Aarons, Pritzker, McShan, and Mackey, JJ. The ruling means that Capasso's name will be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in New York effective immediately.
Additionally, the court ordered that Capasso must cease all legal practice in New York. The ruling commands him to refrain from appearing as an attorney before any court or public authority and to surrender any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him within 30 days of the decision.
Impact
This ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for how attorneys can resign from the bar without facing disciplinary actions. Capasso's case illustrates that attorneys have an option to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, which can be beneficial for those who may wish to leave the profession without the stigma of misconduct.
Capasso's resignation affects not only him but also the legal community in New York. It serves as a reminder that attorneys can step away from their practice under certain conditions, ensuring that the integrity of the legal profession is maintained while allowing for personal choice.
What's Next
Details were not available in the court filing regarding any potential appeals or related cases. However, Capasso is now prohibited from practicing law in New York, and his resignation is effective immediately.