The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has accepted the resignation of attorney James C. Zyskowski. This decision, made on July 24, 2026, allows Zyskowski to step away from his legal practice without any disciplinary action against him. This ruling affects Zyskowski and his clients, marking a significant change in his professional status.
The case, known as the Matter of Zyskowski, was filed under docket number 567 TP 25-02104. The court's acceptance of Zyskowski's resignation means he will no longer be listed as an attorney eligible to practice law in New York State. This decision is important as it highlights the process by which attorneys can resign and the circumstances under which such resignations are accepted.
James C. Zyskowski is the sole party involved in this case, and his decision to resign was for non-disciplinary reasons. This means that Zyskowski is not facing any charges or sanctions that would typically accompany a disciplinary resignation. The court's ruling reflects Zyskowski's personal choice to leave the legal profession rather than any misconduct.
The resignation process for attorneys in New York is governed by specific rules and procedures. In this case, Zyskowski's application to resign was reviewed and accepted by the court. The Appellate Division, which oversees attorney conduct and discipline, confirmed that Zyskowski's resignation met the necessary criteria for acceptance.
The court ruled, "Application to resign for non-disciplinary reasons accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys." This clear statement from the court underscores the straightforward nature of Zyskowski's resignation. The decision was made by a panel of judges, including Curran, Bannister, Montour, Greenwood, and Hannah.
With this ruling, Zyskowski's name has been officially removed from the roll of attorneys in New York. This means he can no longer practice law or represent clients in legal matters. The decision is final and does not indicate any future disciplinary actions against him.
The impact of this ruling extends beyond Zyskowski himself. It serves as a reminder to other attorneys about the options available to them regarding resignation. Attorneys who wish to leave the profession for personal reasons can do so without facing disciplinary proceedings, provided they follow the proper procedures.
This ruling also affects Zyskowski's clients, who will need to find new representation for their legal matters. The court's acceptance of his resignation may lead to questions about the status of ongoing cases and how they will be handled moving forward. Clients are encouraged to seek new legal counsel to ensure their interests are protected.
While this ruling does not set a new legal precedent, it clarifies the process for attorneys wishing to resign for non-disciplinary reasons. It emphasizes that resignations can occur without the stigma of misconduct, allowing attorneys to leave the profession on their own terms.
Looking ahead, Zyskowski's resignation is final, and there are no indications that he plans to appeal the decision. His departure from the legal profession is complete, and he will not be returning to practice law in New York. Details were not available in the court filing regarding any related cases or future plans for Zyskowski.