The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has accepted the resignation of attorney Margaret O. Szczur, formerly known as Margaret Mary Olszewski. This decision, filed on July 24, 2026, allows Szczur to resign from the practice of law for non-disciplinary reasons. It is significant for attorneys and the legal community in New York, as it highlights the process and implications of resigning from the bar.
The court’s decision comes in the context of a formal application submitted by Szczur, who sought to resign without facing any disciplinary actions. This type of resignation is often seen when an attorney chooses to leave the profession for personal or professional reasons that do not involve misconduct.
Margaret Szczur's case is identified under docket number 567 TP 25-02104. The ruling was made by a panel of judges including Curran, Bannister, Montour, Greenwood, and Hannah. Their decision reflects the court's acceptance of her resignation, which is a procedural step in maintaining the integrity of the legal profession.
Background
Margaret O. Szczur is an attorney who has been practicing law in New York. The details surrounding her decision to resign have not been disclosed in the court filing. However, the court accepted her application for resignation, indicating that it was voluntary and not the result of any disciplinary proceedings.
The process for an attorney to resign from the bar typically involves submitting a formal request to the court. This request must be reviewed and accepted by the court to ensure that the attorney is not leaving the profession under circumstances that would require disciplinary action. In this case, Szczur's resignation was accepted without any noted issues.
The Appellate Division’s ruling is a standard procedure in cases where attorneys choose to resign for personal reasons. It serves to keep the records of practicing attorneys accurate and up-to-date, ensuring that only those who are authorized to practice law are listed on the roll of attorneys.
The Ruling
The court ruled that Szczur's application to resign was accepted, and her name was officially removed from the roll of attorneys. The judges stated, “Application to resign for non-disciplinary reasons accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys.” This ruling signifies that Szczur is no longer permitted to practice law in New York.
This decision is part of the court's responsibility to oversee the conduct of attorneys and ensure that only those who meet the necessary qualifications remain active in the legal profession. The ruling was filed on July 9, 2026, and made public on July 24, 2026, allowing for transparency in the resignation process.
Impact
The acceptance of Szczur's resignation has implications for both her and the legal community. For Szczur, it marks the end of her career as an attorney in New York. For the legal community, it reinforces the importance of maintaining an accurate roster of practicing attorneys. This decision also serves as a reminder to other attorneys considering resignation that there are processes in place that allow for a clean exit from the profession.
While this case does not set a legal precedent, it does illustrate the procedures followed by the court in handling resignations. Such cases are important for maintaining the integrity of the legal system and ensuring that attorneys adhere to the standards expected of them.
What's Next
Details were not available in the court filing regarding any potential appeals or related cases. However, as Szczur's resignation was accepted for non-disciplinary reasons, it is unlikely that there will be any further legal proceedings related to this matter.