A New York court has granted Lindsey Ann Spinelli's application for reinstatement to the bar, allowing her to practice law again after resigning in 2021. This decision, made by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, is significant for Spinelli and other attorneys considering similar paths. The ruling reflects the court's assessment of Spinelli's qualifications and her commitment to maintaining her legal education.
Spinelli, who had been admitted to practice law in New York in 2013, resigned from her position in July 2021. At that time, she cited her out-of-state residence and her belief that she would not need her New York license for her employment. Her resignation was non-disciplinary, meaning it did not stem from any misconduct. Now, with changes in her circumstances, she sought to return to the practice of law in New York.
The case, officially titled Matter of Spinelli, was filed under docket number PM-207-26 on September 10, 2026. The court's decision came after Spinelli submitted her application for reinstatement, which included the necessary documentation and proof of her continuing legal education (CLE) credits.
In her application, Spinelli provided evidence that she had completed 11 CLE credits in July 2026, exceeding the minimum requirements set for attorneys seeking reinstatement after a non-disciplinary resignation. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, which oversees attorney conduct and discipline, did not oppose her application, indicating that they found no issues with her character or fitness to practice law.
The court ruled, "Having determined that Spinelli possesses the required legal training and character and fitness, and absent any objection from AGC, we grant her application and restore her name to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law effective immediately." This statement highlights the court's confidence in Spinelli's readiness to resume her legal career.
Judges Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia, Mackey, Corcoran, and Ryba participated in the ruling. Their decision emphasizes the importance of maintaining legal education and character standards for attorneys wishing to return to practice.
The ruling has significant implications for attorneys who have resigned from the bar but wish to return. It reinforces the idea that non-disciplinary resignations do not permanently bar attorneys from reinstatement, provided they meet the necessary educational and character requirements. Spinelli's successful application may encourage other attorneys in similar situations to consider reinstatement.
Moving forward, Spinelli must file an attorney registration statement with the Chief Administrator of the Courts within 30 days of the court's decision. This requirement ensures that she officially updates her status and complies with the regulations governing attorneys in New York.
Spinelli's case does not appear to have any related pending cases or further appeals at this time. Her reinstatement marks a new chapter in her legal career, allowing her to practice law in New York once again.