The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has reinstated attorney Roger Bryant Banks after a suspension that lasted nearly 17 years. This decision, made on August 27, 2026, is significant not only for Banks but also for the legal community, as it highlights the court's process for reinstating attorneys who have previously faced disciplinary actions.

Banks, who represented himself in this matter, had been suspended from practicing law since September 2009 due to violations of Judiciary Law § 468-a. His case was reviewed by the court, which determined that he had fulfilled all necessary requirements to return to the legal profession.

The reinstatement of Banks is a notable event for those who have been following his case and for other attorneys who may find themselves in similar situations. The decision underscores the importance of rehabilitation and the possibility of returning to the legal field after addressing past issues.

Background

Roger Bryant Banks was initially suspended from practicing law in September 2009. The suspension stemmed from violations of Judiciary Law § 468-a, which governs the registration and conduct of attorneys in New York. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department acted as the petitioner in this case, seeking to ensure that attorneys adhere to the standards set forth by the law.

Over the years, Banks worked towards meeting the requirements set by the court for reinstatement. His journey included submitting various documents and affidavits to demonstrate his compliance with the court's orders and the legal profession's ethical standards. The process involved a thorough review by the court to ensure that he was fit to practice law again.

As the case progressed, Banks filed a motion for reinstatement, supported by evidence that he had complied with the rules and regulations governing attorneys. This motion was reviewed by the Appellate Division, which ultimately made the decision to reinstate him.

The Ruling

The Appellate Division ruled in favor of Banks, granting his motion for reinstatement. The court found that he had met the necessary requirements for returning to practice law. The ruling stated, “respondent has satisfied the requirements of Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16 (c) (5) and has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court.”

Additionally, the court confirmed that Banks possessed the requisite character and fitness to practice law, which was a crucial factor in their decision. The ruling emphasized that reinstating Banks would be in the public interest, stating, “it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law.” This decision reflects the court's commitment to allowing attorneys the opportunity for rehabilitation and return to the profession.

Impact

The reinstatement of Roger Banks has significant implications for both him and the broader legal community. For Banks, this ruling marks a new chapter in his professional life, allowing him to return to practicing law after a lengthy absence. It serves as a reminder that individuals can overcome past mistakes and regain their standing in the legal profession.

For the legal community, this case sets a precedent regarding the reinstatement process for attorneys who have faced disciplinary actions. It reinforces the idea that compliance with court orders and ethical standards can lead to rehabilitation. This decision may encourage other attorneys who have faced similar challenges to pursue reinstatement, knowing that the court is open to considering their applications if they demonstrate the necessary changes.

What's Next

With this ruling, Banks is now reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately. There is no indication in the court filing that further appeals are pending or that there are related cases connected to this decision. Banks can now resume his practice, contributing to the legal field once again.