The Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico has confirmed the dismissal of a negligence lawsuit filed by William Cabrera and Louriel Cruz Oquendo against Kareen Mangual Rotger and others. The court ruled that the plaintiffs did not prove that Mangual acted negligently in a real estate transaction that led to their financial losses. This decision impacts individuals involved in real estate transactions and clarifies the responsibilities of real estate agents in Puerto Rico.

The case, known as TA2025AP00230, stemmed from a dispute regarding a property located in the Condominio Capitolio Plaza in San Juan. The plaintiffs alleged that they suffered damages when their mortgage application was denied due to undisclosed title issues related to a storage area in the property. The court's ruling emphasizes the importance of evidence in proving negligence and the role of real estate agents in property transactions.

Background

William Cabrera and Louriel Cruz Oquendo, the appellants, filed their lawsuit on October 27, 2021, against Kareen Mangual Rotger and the property owners, Jaime A. Samham Espinel and Ivette Quiles Alvarado. They claimed that the defendants were negligent by failing to inform them about a title problem concerning the property’s storage area. This issue led to the denial of their mortgage application, preventing them from finalizing the purchase of the property.

In response, Mangual denied any responsibility, arguing that the mortgage denial was not due to her actions. The case went through various stages, including a trial held in April 2025, where the court evaluated the evidence presented by both parties. Ultimately, the lower court ruled in favor of Mangual, leading to the appeal by Cabrera and Cruz.

The Ruling

The Court of Appeals issued its ruling on August 31, 2026, confirming the lower court's decision to dismiss the case. The court found that the appellants failed to demonstrate that Mangual had acted negligently regarding the representations about the storage area. The opinion stated, "The appellants did not prove that the appellant incurred in a culpable act or omission regarding the representations about the storage area." Additionally, the court noted that the appellants acted recklessly in pursuing the litigation, which justified the lower court's imposition of $8,000 in costs and attorney's fees against them.

Judges Cruz Hiraldo, Sánchez Báez, and Torres Reyes formed the special panel that reviewed the case. The court's ruling reinforces the principle that the burden of proof lies with the plaintiffs to establish negligence in such claims.

Impact

This ruling has significant implications for future real estate transactions in Puerto Rico. It clarifies the responsibilities of real estate agents and underscores the necessity for buyers to conduct thorough due diligence before finalizing property purchases. The court's decision sets a precedent regarding the standard of proof required in negligence claims against real estate professionals.

Moreover, the ruling may deter potential litigants from pursuing similar claims without sufficient evidence of negligence, as the court emphasized the importance of proving a direct link between the alleged negligence and the damages suffered. This case serves as a reminder for all parties involved in real estate transactions to ensure clear communication and transparency regarding property conditions.

What's Next

The appellants may consider appealing the decision to the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, although details about any potential appeal were not available in the court filing. There are currently no related cases pending that could affect this ruling.