A Tennessee court recently upheld a divorce ruling involving a same-sex couple, affecting child custody and support arrangements for their triplets. The Court of Appeals of Tennessee ruled on November 10, 2026, in the case of Courtney Wells Cannon v. Ashley Matte Cannon (docket number M2025-00101-COA-R3-CV). The court's decision comes after a contentious divorce trial that highlighted the complexities of parenting and financial responsibilities in modern families.

The case centers around Courtney Cannon, the primary breadwinner, and Ashley Cannon, who became a stay-at-home mother after giving birth to triplets during their six-year marriage. The trial court had previously designated Courtney as the primary residential parent, while Ashley was named the alternate parent. Ashley appealed the decision, arguing that the trial court had unfairly imputed income to her, deeming her underemployed despite her recent return to work.

Background

Courtney and Ashley Cannon married in March 2016 and welcomed triplets in March 2018. Their marriage faced challenges early on, including disagreements about parenting styles and the impact of Courtney's busy work schedule on their family life. Ashley had previously worked as a director for an after-school music program but became a stay-at-home mom after the triplets were born. The couple's relationship deteriorated over time, culminating in Courtney filing for divorce in June 2022.

The divorce proceedings were marked by disputes over child custody and support. The trial court held a six-day trial where both parents presented their cases. Courtney, who had resumed her career and was earning significantly more than Ashley, argued that Ashley's lack of full-time employment contributed to their marital issues. Ashley, on the other hand, cited health problems and anxiety as barriers to her employment during the marriage.

The Ruling

The Court of Appeals, led by Judge Carma Dennis McGee, affirmed the trial court's ruling. The court noted that the trial court had made a thorough assessment of the evidence presented during the trial. In its opinion, the court stated, "The trial court's decision to designate Courtney as the primary residential parent was supported by the evidence presented during the trial." The court also upheld the trial court's decision to impute income to Ashley, emphasizing that she had sufficient time to seek full-time employment.

Judge McGee, joined by Chief Judge Frank G. Clement Jr. and Judge W. Neal McBrayer, highlighted the importance of ensuring the children's best interests in custody arrangements. The court found that Courtney's stable income and involvement in the children's lives made her the more suitable primary residential parent.

Impact

This ruling has significant implications for child custody cases, particularly those involving same-sex couples and non-traditional family structures. It underscores the courts' focus on the best interests of the children when determining custody arrangements and financial responsibilities. The decision also reinforces the notion that parents must actively seek employment to support their families, especially in cases where one parent has been primarily responsible for childcare.

The ruling may set a precedent for future custody disputes, particularly in cases where one parent has taken time off work for childcare responsibilities. It emphasizes the need for both parents to communicate effectively and cooperate in co-parenting arrangements, as the court noted the difficulties in the Cannons' ability to co-parent amicably.

What's Next

Details were not available in the court filing regarding any potential appeal by Ashley Cannon. However, given the court's affirmance of the trial court's ruling, it is unclear whether further legal action will be pursued. The case highlights ongoing issues in family law, especially concerning custody and support in same-sex marriages.