The Texas Court of Appeals has denied a petition for writ of mandamus filed by Michael Bachand against the City of Westworth Village. This ruling, issued on July 27, 2026, has implications for Bachand's ongoing legal issues with the city.
The court's decision means that Bachand will not receive the relief he sought through this legal action. The denial of the writ of mandamus signifies that the court found no grounds to intervene in the lower court's proceedings or decisions regarding Bachand's case.
Michael Bachand is the relator in this case, meaning he is the party seeking a legal remedy from the court. The City of Westworth Village is the respondent, the entity against which the petition is filed. Details about the specific nature of the dispute between Bachand and the city were not available in the court filing.
The Texas Court of Appeals, specifically the Second Appellate District located in Fort Worth, reviewed Bachand's petition and motion for a temporary stay. The court considered the merits of his claims but ultimately decided against granting the relief he requested.
In its ruling, the court stated, "the court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary stay and is of the opinion that relief should be denied." This indicates that the judges found insufficient justification to grant Bachand's requests.
The judges involved in this decision included Bassel, Kerr, and Walker, although the opinion does not specify which judge authored the ruling. Instead, it is labeled as a per curiam opinion, meaning it reflects the collective judgment of the court rather than an individual judge.
This ruling may have significant implications for Bachand's legal standing and future actions against the City of Westworth Village. Denial of a writ of mandamus can limit a party's options in seeking judicial relief, particularly if they believe a lower court has made an error.
Going forward, this decision may affect how Bachand approaches his case. He may need to explore other legal avenues or reconsider his strategy in dealing with the city. The denial of the writ means that the court will not intervene in the lower court's decisions at this time.
It is important to note that the court's ruling does not prevent Bachand from continuing to pursue his case in other ways. He may still have the option to appeal the lower court's decisions through different legal channels or to file additional motions if new evidence arises.
As of now, there are no indications in the court's opinion regarding the potential for an appeal or any related cases pending that could affect this situation. Details were not available in the court filing.