The Texas Court of Appeals has dismissed an appeal filed by Professional Service Industries, Inc. against Supreme Bright Grapevine VII, LLC. This decision, issued on June 11, 2026, affects the parties involved in the case and clarifies the legal standing regarding the voluntary dismissal of appeals.

The dismissal came after Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) submitted a motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal. The court granted this motion, which means that the appeal will not proceed any further. Additionally, the court ruled that PSI is responsible for all costs associated with the appeal.

This case, docket number 02-26-00348-CV, arose from a dispute between PSI and Supreme Bright Grapevine VII, LLC. Details about the nature of the dispute were not available in the court filing, but it is clear that the case was significant enough to warrant an appeal to the Texas Court of Appeals.

Background

Professional Service Industries, Inc. is a company that provides various professional services, while Supreme Bright Grapevine VII, LLC is likely a business entity involved in real estate or development, given the naming conventions typically used in such cases. The specifics of their disagreement are not detailed in the court's opinion, which limits the understanding of the broader context of their conflict.

The appeal reached the Texas Court of Appeals after the trial court's decision in the 348th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas. The exact ruling from the lower court is not included in the opinion, but it is common for parties to appeal decisions they believe are unjust or incorrect. In this case, PSI sought to challenge the trial court's ruling but ultimately decided to withdraw its appeal.

The Ruling

The court ruled to grant PSI's motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal. The opinion states, “We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.” This indicates that the court found no reason to continue with the appeal process, likely reflecting the wishes of PSI.

Additionally, the court specified that PSI must pay all costs associated with the appeal: “Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.” This ruling underscores the financial responsibilities that come with filing an appeal, particularly when a party chooses to withdraw their case.

The opinion was delivered per curiam, meaning it was issued by the court collectively rather than by a single judge. The judges involved in this decision were Wallach, Sudderth, and Walker.

Impact

The dismissal of this appeal has implications for both parties. For Professional Service Industries, Inc., the decision means that they will not have the opportunity to challenge the lower court's ruling. This could impact their business operations or financial standing, depending on the nature of the original dispute with Supreme Bright Grapevine VII, LLC.

Moreover, the requirement for PSI to pay the costs of the appeal serves as a reminder to businesses and individuals about the financial risks associated with litigation. Dismissing an appeal can sometimes be a strategic decision, but it also carries the weight of additional costs that must be considered.

What’s Next

As the appeal has been dismissed, there are no further proceedings in this case at the appellate level. The court's ruling is final unless PSI decides to pursue other legal avenues, which are not detailed in the opinion. There are no indications of a related case pending in the court filing.