The Texas Court of Appeals has dismissed an appeal filed by Thomas Guevara, Bexar County Deputy Manager, and David Smith, Bexar County Budget Director, against Judge Nadine M. Nieto. This decision, made on November 10, 2026, affects the governance and budget management of Bexar County. The dismissal was granted after the appellants filed a motion to dismiss their own appeal, which the court accepted.
This case, identified by docket number 04-26-00616-CV, highlights the legal processes surrounding appeals and injunctions within local government. The dismissal indicates that the court found no need to further pursue the appeal, as the motion was unopposed by the appellee, Judge Nieto.
Background
The parties involved in this case are Thomas Guevara and David Smith, who hold significant positions in Bexar County's local government. Guevara serves as the Deputy Manager, while Smith is the Budget Director and County Manager. They appealed against Honorable Nadine M. Nieto, the Presiding Judge of the 285th Judicial District Court.
The dispute arose from a lower court's injunction that likely involved matters of budget management or governance within Bexar County. Specific details about the original injunction were not available in the court filing. The case moved to the Texas Court of Appeals after the lower court's decision prompted the county officials to seek a review.
The Ruling
The Texas Court of Appeals ruled to dismiss the appeal filed by Guevara and Smith. The court noted that the appellants submitted a motion to dismiss their appeal, which included a certificate of service to the appellee, Judge Nieto. Since there was no opposition to the motion, the court granted it. The ruling stated, "Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal."
The judges on the panel included Lori I. Valenzuela, Lori Massey Brissette, and Adrian A. Spears II. The court's decision to dismiss the appeal also indicated that the costs of the appeal would be taxed against the appellants.
Impact
This dismissal has implications for Bexar County's governance and budgetary processes. By dismissing the appeal, the court effectively upholds the lower court's injunction, although the specifics of that injunction remain undisclosed. The ruling may serve as a reminder to local officials about the importance of adhering to judicial decisions and the potential consequences of pursuing appeals that lack substantial opposition.
The outcome of this case could influence how local government officials approach future legal disputes, particularly regarding budgetary matters. It also emphasizes the role of the judiciary in overseeing local governance and ensuring compliance with legal standards.
What's Next
Details were not available in the court filing regarding any potential for appeal or related cases. However, given the dismissal, it is unclear if Guevara and Smith will pursue further legal action regarding the injunction or related matters.
Read Next
Texas Court dismisses appeal due to late filing by defendant
Court rules Colorado notary not subject to Texas jurisdiction
Texas Supreme Court denies death row inmates' petition
Nevada Supreme Court dismisses Callahan v. Liberty Mutual appeal
Court affirms denial of survivor annuity benefits for Valdez
Court dismisses Warren Fambro's appeal for lack of timeliness










