The Wyoming Supreme Court has issued a public censure against attorney Corrie Lynn Lamb following a series of professional misconduct violations. The court's ruling, filed on October 21, 2026, stems from Lamb's failure to appear in court, tardiness, and lack of preparation for hearings. This decision affects Lamb's legal career and serves as a warning to other attorneys about the importance of diligence in their practice.

The case, identified as D-26-0004, began when the Board of Professional Responsibility for the Wyoming State Bar filed a Report and Recommendation for Public Censure on October 8, 2026. The court reviewed the recommendation and found sufficient grounds to impose the censure, highlighting the need for accountability among legal professionals.

Corrie Lynn Lamb, who was admitted to the Wyoming State Bar in September 2017, practiced law in various firms until 2022 when she co-founded Shepherd Law, LLC with her husband. The issues leading to her censure began in late October 2025 when four judges from the Sixth Judicial District expressed concerns about her conduct. They reported that Lamb was frequently late to hearings, unprepared, and often failed to appear altogether.

The judges' complaints prompted Bar Counsel to investigate Lamb's conduct under several rules of professional conduct, including diligence and competence. Despite being given an opportunity to respond to the allegations, Lamb failed to do so in a timely manner. Her eventual response denied any wrongdoing, attributing her issues to staffing problems in her office.

As the investigation continued, additional reports from judges confirmed a troubling pattern of behavior. Judge Stuart Healy noted that Lamb's tardiness and unpreparedness had been ongoing since he took the bench in December 2020. He described instances where Lamb had to pause court proceedings to confer with clients due to lack of preparation, and even cited an occasion where she was seen vaping in the courtroom.

On December 22, 2025, the Review and Oversight Committee found probable cause to pursue formal charges against Lamb. The formal charge was filed by Bar Counsel in January 2026, leading to a stipulation between Lamb and Bar Counsel acknowledging her violations of the rules of professional conduct.

The Wyoming Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of the Board of Professional Responsibility's recommendation for public censure. Chief Justice Lynne Boomgaarden stated, "The court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be approved, confirmed and adopted by the Court." The court ordered Lamb to pay a total of $800 to the Wyoming State Bar, which includes an administrative fee and costs associated with the disciplinary proceedings.

The ruling serves as a reminder of the importance of diligence and professionalism in the legal field. The court emphasized that attorneys must act with reasonable diligence in representing their clients, as outlined in Rule 1.3 of the Wyoming Rules of Professional Conduct. Failure to do so not only impacts the attorney's reputation but can also have serious consequences for their clients.

Moving forward, this public censure may impact Lamb's legal career and her ability to attract new clients. It also highlights the importance of maintaining high standards of conduct within the legal profession. While the censure does not result in suspension or disbarment, it marks a significant blemish on Lamb's professional record.

This case may set a precedent for future disciplinary actions against attorneys who fail to meet the standards of diligence and professionalism expected in the legal field. It underscores the necessity for attorneys to adhere to their obligations and the potential consequences of neglecting those responsibilities.

As for what’s next, it remains unclear if Lamb intends to appeal the court's decision. The court filing did not specify any plans for an appeal or if there are related cases pending. However, the ruling is now a matter of public record and will be published in legal reports, further solidifying the implications of this censure in the legal community.