The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently upheld rulings from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) regarding antidumping duties on steel imports from Turkey. The case, Eregli Demir Ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S. v. ITC (Docket No. 24-2242), involves the Turkish steel producer Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları T.A.Ş. (Erdemir) and several U.S. steel companies. This ruling is significant as it confirms the continuation of duties that many believe protect domestic steel manufacturers from unfair competition.
The court's decision affects not only the parties involved in the case but also sets a precedent for future trade disputes involving antidumping duties. It highlights the ongoing tensions in U.S.-Turkey trade relations and the complexities of international trade law.
The dispute began when the U.S. Department of Commerce issued an antidumping-duty order in 2016 against certain hot-rolled steel flat products imported from Turkey, among other countries. The order was based on findings that Erdemir and another Turkish company, Çolakoğlu Metalurji A.S., had engaged in dumping practices, meaning they sold their products in the U.S. at prices lower than their fair market value. The ITC determined that this dumping was causing material injury to the U.S. steel industry, which includes major companies like United States Steel Corporation and Nucor Corporation.
Erdemir did not initially challenge the ITC's determination of material injury but later sought to overturn the antidumping duties after Çolakoğlu was excluded from the order due to a finding of no dumping. Erdemir argued that the exclusion meant that imports from Turkey were now negligible and could not cause material injury to the U.S. industry.
To seek relief, Erdemir filed several lawsuits in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT), targeting different aspects of the ITC's decisions. The CIT ruled against Erdemir, sustaining the ITC's determination in a sunset review, which assesses whether existing antidumping duties should remain in place after five years. Erdemir appealed these decisions to the Federal Circuit.
On June 1, 2026, the Federal Circuit affirmed the CIT's rulings, stating, "The Commission's material injury ruling in 2016 was a final agency determination that was not timely challenged, so the Commission properly took it as a starting point in its inquiry into continuation or recurrence of injury." The court emphasized that the ITC's analysis during its sunset review was thorough and supported by substantial evidence.
The ruling also addressed Erdemir's request for a changed-circumstances review, which was denied by the ITC. The court found that the ITC's refusal was justified because the agency had already initiated a sunset review, making the request duplicative.
This decision has significant implications for U.S. steel manufacturers and international trade policy. By upholding the ITC's determinations, the court reinforced the existing framework for evaluating antidumping duties, which are designed to protect domestic industries from unfair foreign competition. The ruling emphasizes the importance of timely challenges to administrative decisions and the necessity for clear legal grounds when seeking reviews.
The ruling also signals to foreign producers that the U.S. will continue to enforce antidumping measures rigorously. This could deter other foreign companies from attempting to enter the U.S. market with products that might be considered unfairly priced.
Looking ahead, it remains to be seen whether Erdemir will seek further recourse, including a potential appeal to the Supreme Court. As of now, no related cases are pending, but the outcome of this case could influence future trade disputes involving antidumping duties and international trade relations.
In conclusion, the Federal Circuit's affirmation of the ITC's rulings in the Eregli Demir Ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S. v. ITC case underscores the complexities of international trade law and the ongoing challenges faced by domestic industries in navigating these legal frameworks.











