In a recent ruling, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal from Anthony Armand Polich, a veteran seeking an increased disability rating for his service-related conditions. The decision, made on October 29, 2026, affects veterans who may be navigating similar claims for disability benefits related to mental health and traumatic brain injuries (TBI).

This case highlights the complexities veterans face when seeking benefits for conditions that overlap, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and TBI. The court's ruling emphasizes the importance of clear medical evidence when determining the severity of these conditions and their impact on a veteran's life.

Background

Anthony Polich served in the United States Army from 1967 to 1969 and was medically retired due to injuries sustained during the Vietnam War. In 1997, he began seeking benefits for PTSD, which was initially rated at 30%. By 2002, this rating increased to 50% due to worsening symptoms.

In 2010, Polich sought service connection for residuals of a TBI, which the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) granted in 2013. However, the VA assigned a 0% disability rating for his TBI, arguing that his memory loss was likely caused by PTSD symptoms rather than the TBI itself. Reports from subsequent VA examinations supported this conclusion, noting that his memory issues began decades after his TBI.

Despite the VA's evaluations, Polich continued to seek an increased rating for his TBI, arguing that his memory impairments were a direct result of the injury. The Board of Veterans' Appeals and the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims both upheld the VA's decision, leading Polich to appeal to the Federal Circuit.

The Ruling

The Federal Circuit, composed of Judges Chen, Stoll, and Stark, ultimately dismissed Polich's appeal. The court ruled that Polich did not raise a legal issue over which it had jurisdiction. Specifically, the court stated, "Mr. Polich’s arguments do not raise a legal issue over which we have jurisdiction."

The court clarified that the Veterans Court had applied the appropriate regulation regarding the evaluation of overlapping symptoms from different conditions. It noted that under 38 C.F.R. § 4.124a, if the manifestations of two or more conditions cannot be clearly separated, a single evaluation is to be assigned under whichever set of criteria allows for the best assessment of overall functioning. The court found that Polich had failed to provide evidence that his memory impairments could be separated from his PTSD.

Impact

This ruling has significant implications for veterans seeking disability benefits for overlapping conditions. It underscores the necessity for clear medical evidence linking symptoms to specific injuries or conditions. The decision may deter some veterans from pursuing claims if they cannot provide distinct evidence separating their symptoms.

Furthermore, the ruling reinforces the VA's authority to determine disability ratings based on the overall impact of combined conditions. Veterans may need to prepare for the possibility that their claims could be denied if they cannot clearly demonstrate how their symptoms are attributable to specific service-related injuries.

What's Next

Polich's case is now dismissed, but he may have limited options to appeal the ruling. Details were not available in the court filing regarding any potential further legal actions or related cases pending in other courts.