The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has dismissed an appeal in the personal injury case of Mensah v. Griffiths. The decision, made on November 13, 2026, affects the plaintiff, Patrick Mensah, who was seeking to renew and reargue a previous order. This dismissal marks a significant turn in the legal proceedings for both parties involved.

In this case, Patrick Mensah filed a lawsuit against Robert James Griffiths and Wilcor International, Inc. The dispute arose from a personal injury claim, but details regarding the nature of the injury or the circumstances surrounding it were not available in the court filing. The case was initially heard in the Supreme Court of Herkimer County, where Judge Mark R. Rose denied Mensah's motion for leave to renew and reargue his case on May 5, 2025.

The appeal reached the Appellate Division after Mensah sought to challenge the lower court's decision. His legal representation was provided by the Redmond Law Firm, while Griffiths and Wilcor International were represented by Costello, Cooney & Fearon. The case, identified by docket number 825 CA 25-01075, was part of the ongoing legal discussions regarding personal injury claims in New York.

On November 13, 2026, the Appellate Division reviewed the case and issued a ruling that dismissed the appeal. The court noted that the dismissal was based on a stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for both parties on October 9 and 12, 2026. This agreement effectively ended the legal proceedings without further costs to either party.

The court ruled that the appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

The decision was made by a panel of judges including Whalen, P.J., Lindley, Ogden, Nowak, and Delconte. The ruling did not provide further details on the implications of the case or the reasons behind the stipulation, as the court filing did not elaborate on these aspects.

The dismissal of this appeal means that the original order from the Supreme Court of Herkimer County stands. This outcome is significant for Mensah, as he will not have the opportunity to renew or reargue his case in the appellate court. This ruling may also impact similar personal injury claims in New York, as it underscores the importance of procedural steps in pursuing appeals.

Going forward, the dismissal of the appeal in Mensah v. Griffiths means that there are no further legal proceedings related to this case unless new actions are initiated. The stipulation of discontinuance suggests that both parties have reached an agreement outside of court, which may indicate a resolution to their dispute.

Details regarding any potential appeals or related cases were not available in the court filing. However, the dismissal of this appeal closes this chapter of the legal battle for both Mensah and Griffiths.