The New York Appellate Division of the Supreme Court has accepted the resignation of attorney Daniel McManus Ryan. This decision, made on October 8, 2026, allows Ryan to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons. The ruling affects Ryan, who has been a practicing attorney since 2012, and it is significant as it highlights the process of resigning from the bar in New York.
Ryan, who is based in Mendota Heights, Minnesota, filed his application to resign from the New York bar on August 17, 2026. The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (AGC) did not oppose his request. The court's decision to accept his resignation means that Ryan is no longer permitted to practice law in New York.
This case, identified by docket number PM-227-26, illustrates the procedures involved when an attorney wishes to resign from the bar without facing disciplinary action. The court's ruling emphasizes the importance of following proper protocols for resignation, even in the absence of disciplinary issues.
In the ruling, the court stated, "Daniel McManus Ryan's application for permission to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted." The decision was made by a panel of judges, including Aarons, J.P., Ceresia, Fisher, Powers, and Corcoran.
The court also ordered that Ryan's name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in New York, effective immediately. This means he can no longer practice law in any capacity within the state. The ruling further commands Ryan to refrain from any legal practice and to surrender any Attorney Secure Pass he holds within 30 days.
The acceptance of Ryan's resignation is significant for several reasons. It underscores the process for attorneys who choose to leave the profession without facing disciplinary action. The ruling also sets a clear precedent for similar cases in the future, showing that the court takes such applications seriously and follows established procedures.
Moving forward, Ryan's resignation means he will not be able to provide legal services or advice in New York. This ruling may also impact any clients he had in the state, as they will need to seek representation from another attorney. Additionally, it serves as a reminder to other attorneys of the importance of adhering to the rules governing their profession.
As for what comes next, Ryan's resignation is final and does not appear to be subject to appeal. There are no related cases pending that would affect this decision. The court's ruling is conclusive, and Ryan's status as an attorney in New York is officially terminated.