The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has accepted the resignation of attorney Lawrence Irwin Goldstein. This decision, made on November 13, 2026, allows Goldstein to resign from the practice of law for non-disciplinary reasons. The ruling is significant as it removes his name from the official roll of attorneys, impacting his ability to practice law in the state.

The case, known as Matter of Goldstein, was filed on November 13, 2026, and has been assigned docket number &mdash. The decision was made by a panel of judges including Lindley, J.P., Ogden, Nowak, Delconte, and Skinner. This ruling highlights the procedures that attorneys must follow when they choose to resign from their positions.

Background

Lawrence Irwin Goldstein, the resignor in this case, is an attorney who sought to leave the practice of law. The reasons for his resignation were not disciplinary in nature, which means he was not facing any legal or ethical violations that would warrant disciplinary action from the bar association. Instead, Goldstein's decision to resign appears to be a personal choice.

The process for resigning as an attorney in New York involves submitting an application to the court, which must then review and accept the resignation. In this case, Goldstein successfully completed that process, resulting in the court's acceptance of his resignation. This case illustrates the legal framework that governs the resignation of attorneys in New York State.

The Ruling

The court ruled to accept Goldstein's application to resign, stating, "Application to resign for non-disciplinary reasons accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys." This decision underscores the court's authority to manage the roll of attorneys and maintain the integrity of the legal profession.

The judges involved in this decision were Lindley, J.P., Ogden, Nowak, Delconte, and Skinner. Their ruling reflects the court's commitment to upholding the legal standards for attorneys while also respecting their personal decisions to step away from the profession.

Impact

This ruling has implications for Goldstein and the legal community in New York. By accepting his resignation, the court has formally recognized his decision to leave the practice of law, which means he will no longer have the privileges and responsibilities that come with being an attorney. This decision may also serve as a precedent for other attorneys considering resignation for similar non-disciplinary reasons.

Furthermore, the acceptance of such resignations can impact the legal landscape by ensuring that the roll of attorneys remains accurate and up to date. It helps maintain public trust in the legal profession by ensuring that only those who wish to practice law are listed as active attorneys.

What's Next

Details were not available in the court filing regarding whether Goldstein plans to pursue any further legal action or if there are related cases pending. However, once an attorney resigns, they typically cannot appeal the decision as it is a voluntary action.