The Puerto Rico Court of Appeals recently ruled on a case involving Rosa I. Rodríguez Ayuso and the Department of Public Safety (DSP). The court upheld a previous decision by the Commission for Public Service Appeals (CASP) that dismissed Rodríguez Ayuso's appeal regarding her job classification. This ruling is significant for public employees in Puerto Rico, as it clarifies the strict deadlines for filing appeals in administrative matters.
Rosa I. Rodríguez Ayuso, a public employee, filed a judicial review request on June 5, 2026, after her appeal was dismissed by the CASP on February 26, 2026. The CASP determined that Rodríguez Ayuso's appeal was filed late, which led to the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. This case highlights the importance of adhering to procedural deadlines in administrative law.
The dispute began when the Office of Administration and Human Resources Transformation (OATRH) notified Rodríguez Ayuso on February 22, 2023, that her job position had been reclassified. The notice informed her that she had thirty days to seek an administrative review from the DSP. If she was unsatisfied with the DSP's decision, she could appeal to the CASP within thirty days of receiving that decision. However, the DSP did not notify her of its decision until June 26, 2023, which was several months later than the sixty days allowed for such notifications.
Rodríguez Ayuso filed her administrative review request with the DSP on March 15, 2023. The DSP issued its decision against her on May 4, 2026, but did not notify her until June 26, 2023. Following the DSP's decision, Rodríguez Ayuso appealed to the CASP on July 23, 2023. The CASP ruled that her appeal was filed outside the thirty-day jurisdictional deadline, which expired on June 14, 2023, after the sixty-day period for the DSP to notify her had passed.
The CASP stated, “The fact that the promoting party [the DSP] did not comply with the deadlines in the regulations does not extend the term with which the appealing party [Rodríguez Ayuso] had to comply.” This ruling emphasized that jurisdictional terms are strict and cannot be extended, regardless of the circumstances surrounding the late notification from the DSP.
In her appeal to the Court of Appeals, Rodríguez Ayuso argued that she had filed her appeal within the thirty-day timeframe after receiving the DSP's notification. However, the court concluded that the CASP did not err in its decision. The ruling confirmed that the CASP lacked jurisdiction to hear her appeal because it was filed after the deadline.
The court stated, “We conclude that the CASP lacked jurisdiction to address the appellant's request.” This decision reinforces the principle that administrative agencies must adhere to established timelines and that failure to do so can result in the loss of the right to appeal.
The impact of this ruling extends beyond Rodríguez Ayuso. It serves as a reminder to public employees in Puerto Rico about the importance of understanding and adhering to procedural timelines when filing appeals in administrative matters. The court's decision reinforces the notion that jurisdictional deadlines are strict and must be followed to ensure that appeals are heard.
This case also highlights the broader implications for public sector employees who may find themselves in similar situations. The ruling clarifies that even if an agency fails to meet its notification deadlines, individuals must still comply with the established timelines for appeals. This can affect many public employees who rely on administrative processes to address grievances related to their employment.
Looking ahead, it is unclear whether Rodríguez Ayuso will seek to appeal this decision further. The court's ruling is final unless a higher court decides to take up the case. There may also be related cases pending that could further clarify the application of jurisdictional deadlines in administrative law.
Overall, the ruling by the Puerto Rico Court of Appeals in the case of Rosa I. Rodríguez Ayuso v. Departamento De Seguridad Pública underscores the critical importance of adhering to procedural deadlines in administrative law. It serves as a significant precedent for public employees navigating the appeals process in Puerto Rico.






