Kentucky County Jail




	
	On November 28, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of West Virginia announced that David Hughart of Crab Orchard, West Virginia was charged with two federal crimes.  Hughart was the executive for Massey Energy Company, and the US Attorney’s Office reported he is charged with “conspiring to impede the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and conspiring to violate mine health and safety laws.”  
	
	Hughart was the former president of Massey’s Green Valley Resource Group, and he is the highest-ranking official charged in the continuing investigation into Massey so far.  
	
	According to the US Attorney’s Office, Hughart and other employees for Massey willingly tried to violate health and safety laws and then tried to hide the violations by warning mine operators before MSHA inspectors came for inspection.  The criminal activity continued from 2000 to March 2010 at Green Valley group and other Massey mines as well.  
	
	Coals mines are subject to large numbers of federal health and safety standards in order to prevent collapses, explosions, fires and more.  MSHA inspections are unannounced and performed frequently to make sure companies are complying with federal standards.  If MSHA inspectors record violations, mine owners can receive monetary penalties and the mine may even be shutdown until the violations are fixed.  
	
	U.S. Attorney Goodwin stated: “Miners deserve a safe place to earn a living.  Some mine officials, unfortunately, seem to believe health and safety laws are optional.  That attitude has no place in the mining industry or any industry.  Today’s charges reinforce that urgent message.”  
	
	The FBI, the Department of Labor Office’s Inspector General, and the IRS’s Criminal Investigation Division were in charge of the investigation.  The company that took control of Massey’s operations after is a merger in June 2011, Alpha Natural Resources Inc, is working with the investigation as well.  
	
	Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation

	
	On November 30, 2012, the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan announced that a former General Motors engineer and her husband planned to steal trade secrets on hybrid technology from GM.  They intended to use the secrets in a joint venture with a competitor in China.  
	
	The woman’s name is Shanshan Du, and her husband’s name is Yu Qin.  They are from Troy, Michigan, and they were convicted and sentenced for unlawful possession of trade secrets.  Qin was also convicted of wire fraud and obstruction.  
	
	According to trial evidence, the defendants conspired to steal the trade secrets from December 2003 to May 2006.  As Du was employed with GM’s hybrid vehicle technology group, she provided information on hybrid vehicles to her husband.  The trade secrets were used for their jointly owned company in China called Millennium Technology International Inc.  
	
	Du copied over 16,000 GM files five days after receiving a severance agreement by GM.  Within months, Qin provided hybrid vehicle technology to a manufacturer and competitor of GM in China called Chery Automobile.  
	
	A search warrant was executed in May 2006, and the FBI recovered large amounts of computer and electric evidence.  After the search warrant, the defendants drove to a dumpster behind a grocery store where they discarded bags of shredded documents with GM trade secret information.  
	
	The husband and wife both face up to 10 years in prison on each trade secret count.  Qin also faces up to 30 years in prison for each wire fraud count and up to 20 years in prison for the obstruction of justice charge.  They are scheduled for sentencing in February 2013.  
	
	The FBI was in charge of the investigation, and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Cathleen Corkin, Michael Martin, and Linda Aouate were in charge of prosecution.  
	
	Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation


What training is involved in mediation?
In the context of legal history mediation is a relatively new and ever evolving field in the legal environment. This being said there is currently no state in the Union that requires an individual to be certified or even have any kind of training in order to be a mediator. Many states, however, do require that an individual have at least some form of training or education in the field of mediation. The state of Massachusetts, for example requires a minimum of 30 hours of training for mediators. Training can also be satisfied by appropriate classes taken in undergraduate school, law school, business school or any other form of higher learning. The courses that qualify are usually those that deal with alternate dispute resolution, negotiation, and arbitration.
Why would someone get training if it is not required?
Even though mediation training is not required it is highly beneficial for those seeking to enter the field. First and foremost, mediation is a voluntary action taken by parties to a dispute. That being said, parties are free to choose their own mediators and are not court appointed. On that point it is in the mediator's best interest to be as knowledgeable about the procedures, strategies, and methods involved in mediation in order to retain clients and receive satisfactory results.
Must a mediator be certified?
As mentioned above, there is no state in the Union that requires a mediator to be certified. However, some courts require qualification standards in order to be considered in court referrels or providing services in court-connected dispute resolution programs. The court of your jurisdiction will often provide a list of these mediators for parties to choose from. As mentioned, one is not required to pick from this list and they are free to choose an outside mediator to resolve the situation.
What standards do mediators have to follow?
Mediators are not subject to exclusionary rules of evidence, or rules of evidence and there is virtually no court interaction. However, a mediator should be impartial and act as a neutral member of the negotiations. He/she has an obligation to be competent about the subject matter and be capable of devoting the time and effort necessary to resolve the matter.
 The Fayette county jail is committed to helping the community by detaining those who have committed or are being accused of criminal acts. Through the Fayette county jail, programs are being created and organized, in order to serve the greater community. Furthermore, these service projects are being carried through with the help of inmates of the jail.
The Fayette county jail is committed to helping the community by detaining those who have committed or are being accused of criminal acts. Through the Fayette county jail, programs are being created and organized, in order to serve the greater community. Furthermore, these service projects are being carried through with the help of inmates of the jail.
The basis of the Fayette county jail community service program is to have the inmates participate in manual labor scenarios, in order to fix vandalized pieces of the town, and to give back to the community. One of the largest community service endeavors taken on the inmates of the Fayette county jail was a cleanup program in which inmates cleaned public buildings, schools, walls, churches, and every other location that could be found to have graffiti on it. Once this job was done, it was estimated that the inmates cleaned off over 4,000 tags of graffiti.