The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has upheld a decision granting workers' compensation benefits to Calvin Chaffers, a former shipyard worker at Jeffboat, Inc. Chaffers claimed he suffered from breathing difficulties due to exposure to harmful chemicals while working. This ruling affects workers in similar industries who may face health risks on the job.

The case, Jeffboat, Incorporated v. Director, OWCP (Docket No. 24-2234), centers around Chaffers' claim under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. The court's decision, issued on June 23, 2026, confirms the importance of workplace safety and the rights of employees to seek compensation for work-related injuries.

Background

Calvin Chaffers worked as a ship painter for Jeffboat, Inc. for twelve years before being laid off in 2017. After his layoff, he filed a claim for workers' compensation, asserting that his job exposed him to various lung irritants that caused breathing problems. Jeffboat and its insurance provider, American Longshore Mutual Association, Ltd., contested the claim, leading to a formal hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ).

During the hearing, Chaffers presented evidence including his medical history and expert testimony. He stated that his work involved exposure to toxic paints and other hazardous materials, which he believed contributed to his respiratory issues. The ALJ ultimately ruled in favor of Chaffers, granting him partial disability benefits.

The Ruling

The Seventh Circuit affirmed the ALJ's decision, stating that Chaffers was entitled to benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. Judge Maldonado wrote, "Under the deferential substantial evidence standard, we affirm." This standard means that the court will uphold the ALJ's findings as long as they are supported by sufficient evidence.

The court noted that Chaffers had established a prima facie case by demonstrating that he suffered harm and that workplace conditions could have caused that harm. The ALJ found that Chaffers' medical evidence, including diagnoses from his treating physician and an expert, supported his claim of lung impairment.

Impact

This ruling is significant for workers in hazardous occupations, as it reinforces the protections afforded under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. The court's decision emphasizes that employees who suffer from work-related injuries have the right to seek compensation, even when their injuries may be compounded by pre-existing health conditions.

Moreover, the ruling sets a precedent for how courts may evaluate claims involving multiple potential causes of injury. It highlights the importance of expert testimony in establishing a connection between workplace exposure and health issues.

What's Next

Jeffboat has the option to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, but it is unclear if they will pursue that route. There are no related cases pending that would directly affect this ruling.