The Maryland Court of Appeals has suspended attorney Keith Ryan Havens from practicing law for six months, effective July 16, 2026. However, this suspension is stayed for one year under the terms of a probation agreement. This ruling comes after Havens was found to have violated several rules of professional conduct.
This decision affects Havens, who will be under probation for a year, during which he must adhere to specific conditions set by the court. The ruling also emphasizes the importance of maintaining ethical standards in the legal profession.
Background
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland brought this case against Keith Ryan Havens, a practicing attorney in Maryland. The commission is responsible for investigating complaints against attorneys and ensuring compliance with professional conduct rules.
The dispute arose when the commission found evidence that Havens had violated multiple rules, specifically Rules 19-301.1, 19-301.3, and 19-301.15 of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct. These rules pertain to competence, diligence, and safekeeping of client property, respectively. The case was brought before the Maryland Court of Appeals after the commission and Havens reached a joint petition for a suspension.
The Ruling
The court ruled that Havens would be suspended from practicing law for six months due to the violations identified by the Attorney Grievance Commission. However, the suspension is stayed for one year, meaning it will not take effect immediately as long as Havens complies with the terms of his probation agreement.
The court stated, "Respondent, Keith Ryan Havens, be suspended from the practice of law in Maryland for a period of six months for violations of Rules 19-301.1, 19-301.3, 19-301.15...with the suspension stayed for a period of one year under the terms and conditions of the parties’ probation agreement."
Chief Justice Matthew J. Fader signed the order, indicating that the court took the matter seriously and emphasized the need for accountability among attorneys. Justice Gould did not participate in the consideration of this case.
Impact
This ruling has significant implications for Havens and the legal community in Maryland. By placing Havens on probation, the court aims to ensure that he adheres to the ethical standards required of attorneys. If he fails to meet the conditions of his probation, the suspension could be enforced, which would prevent him from practicing law.
The decision also serves as a reminder to other attorneys about the importance of following professional conduct rules. Violations can lead to serious consequences, including suspension or disbarment. This case reinforces the commitment of the Maryland legal system to uphold ethical standards and protect the public.
What's Next
Havens may appeal this decision, but details on whether he plans to do so were not available in the court filing. Additionally, there are no related cases pending at this time.