The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York has accepted the resignation of attorney David Grigoryan. This decision, made on July 30, 2026, allows Grigoryan to leave the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons. The ruling affects Grigoryan, who has practiced law since 2014, and emphasizes the court's authority over attorney conduct.
Grigoryan's resignation is significant as it highlights the procedures in place for attorneys wishing to leave the profession without facing disciplinary actions. This ruling underscores the importance of maintaining the integrity of the legal profession while allowing attorneys to resign under specific circumstances.
Background
David Grigoryan, who was admitted to practice law in New York in 2014, has been operating out of Hopkinton, New Hampshire. His application for resignation was supported by the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (AGC), which did not oppose his request. This cooperation suggests that Grigoryan's decision to resign was amicable and without any underlying issues that would warrant disciplinary proceedings.
The process began when Grigoryan filed an affidavit on May 6, 2026, expressing his desire to resign. The AGC reviewed his application and provided a response on July 22, 2026. The court's decision came after evaluating the provided documents and determining that Grigoryan met the requirements for a nondisciplinary resignation.
The Ruling
The court ruled in favor of Grigoryan's application, stating, "we grant his application and accept his resignation." The judges involved in this decision included Clark, J.P., Aarons, Ceresia, McShan, and Powers, JJ. The ruling effectively removes Grigoryan from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in New York, making his resignation effective immediately.
In addition to accepting his resignation, the court ordered that Grigoryan must cease practicing law in New York. The court stated, "Grigoryan is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York." This order ensures that Grigoryan cannot represent clients or offer legal advice in New York, maintaining the state's standards for legal practice.
Impact
This ruling has implications for both Grigoryan and the legal community in New York. For Grigoryan, it marks the end of his legal career in the state, allowing him to pursue other opportunities outside of the legal profession. For the legal community, this case illustrates the procedures for attorneys wishing to resign without facing disciplinary actions. It reinforces the idea that attorneys can leave the profession amicably when there are no ethical violations involved.
The acceptance of Grigoryan's resignation also serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining professional standards among attorneys. It highlights the role of the AGC and the court in overseeing attorney conduct and ensuring that the legal profession remains reputable. This decision could encourage other attorneys considering resignation to follow the proper channels, knowing that they can do so without facing disciplinary consequences if they meet the necessary criteria.
What's Next
Details were not available in the court filing regarding whether Grigoryan plans to appeal this decision or if there are any related cases pending. As it stands, Grigoryan's resignation from the New York bar is final and effective immediately.